Meta Pixel
CNR: --
DISPOSED

S MURALIDHARAN vs MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE

Case NumberOriginal Application No. 688/2023
Date of Filing15 Oct 2023
Case TypeOriginal Application
Last Hearing24 Jan 2024
StateDelhi
CityDelhi
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • S MURALIDHARAN
  • S MURALIDHARAN
Respondent
  • MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE

Case Summary

S MURALIDHARAN and S MURALIDHARAN filed Case No. Original Application No. 688/2023 in the National Green Tribunal on 15 Oct 2023 against MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE. The case has undergone 3 hearings over 2 months. The case was disposed of on 24 Jan 2024. 3 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (3)

  • 24JAN 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: Mr. Justice Prakash Shrivastava Mr. Justice Sudhir Agarwal Dr. A. Senthil Vel

  • 9NOV 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: Mr. Justice Prakash Shrivastava Dr. A. Senthil Vel

  • Hearing

    Judge: Mr. Justice Prakash Shrivastava Dr. A. Senthil Vel

Orders (3)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

1 Item No.

14 Court No.

1 BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI Original Application No.

688/2023 S.

Muralidharan Applicant Versus Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change & Ors.

Respondent(s) Date of hearing: 14.02.2024 CORAM: HON’BLE MR.

JUSTICE PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE MR.

JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE) HON’BLE DR.

A.

SENTHIL VEL, EXPERT MEMBER Applicant: Mr.

S.

Muralidharan, Applicant in Person ORDER 1.

This Original Application has been filed by the applicant praying for following reliefs:- “A.

Direct the Comptroller Audit General of India to file a report within 6 months on the amount of loss caused to Elephant habitats and their pathways across nation, by an Audit with the use of Satellite Imaging and Drone based aerial surveying technologies.

B.

Direct the Union of India to recover and re-establish Elephant habitats and migratory corridors for Elephants to move around, as they did for 1000's of years, based on the audit report.

C. and pass such further order or orders as deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” 2.

During the course of argument, learned Counsel for the applicant could not point out any material justifying such a relief as also the jurisdiction of the NGT in this regard.

2 3.

On perusal of the Writ Petition, we find that the applicant has pleaded about the basic nature and habits of the elephants and threat of their survival on account of human elephant conflict.

A plea has also been raised that on account of Government decision to reopen the brick kilns illegally, there is a spur in human and elephant deaths.

4.

Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 is not a Scheduled Enactment under the NGT Act, 2010.

Applicant, present in person, has failed to point out any substantial issue relating to compliance of provisions of the Scheduled Enactments which confers jurisdiction upon the Tribunal under Section 14 and 15 of the NGT Act, 2010.

5. , 2010.

5.

Thus, no case is made out to entertain the present OA which is accordingly dismissed.

Prakash Shrivastava, CP Sudhir Agarwal, JM Dr.

Senthil Vel, EM February 14, 2024 Original Application No.

688/2023 SN.