DEEPAK KUMAR vs GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Party Details
- DEEPAK KUMAR
- GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
- DISTRICT MAGISTRATE GHAZIABAD
- GHAZIABD NAGAR NIGAM
- COMMISSIONER OF POLICE GHAZIABAD
- UTTAR PRADESH POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
- UTTAR PRADESH GROUND WATER DEPARTMENT
Case Summary
DEEPAK KUMAR filed Case No. Original Application No. 744/2023 in the National Green Tribunal on 13 Dec 2023 against GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and DISTRICT MAGISTRATE GHAZIABAD. The case has had one hearing so far. The case is currently pending. 1 order has been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (1)
- Hearing
Judge: Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Tyagi Dr. Afroz Ahmad
Orders (1)
- 20DEC 2023judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 1
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
Item No.5 (Court No.
2) BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. (Through Physical Hearing with Hybrid V.C.
Option) Original Application No.744/2023 Deepak Kumar …Applicant Versus Ghaziabad Development Authority & Ors. …Respondents Date of hearing: 20.12.2023 CORAM: HON’BLE MR.
JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR TYAGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER.
HON’BLE DR.
AFROZ AHMAD, EXPERT MEMBER.
Applicants: Mr.
Sanjeet Paliwal and Ms.
Rimika Chauhan Advocates for the Applicant.
Original Application under Section 14 & 15 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010.
ORDER 1.
Mr.
Deepak Kumar has filed the present application under Sections 14 and 15 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 for appropriate order/direction (i) to respondent no.
3 to immediately close the open drains, (ii) to the respondents to close and dismantle illegal restaurants, eateries and Kisoks etc. operating in Windsor street, (iii) to respondent no.
4 to take stringent action against street parking, (iv) to respondent no.
6 to inspect the restaurants/shop owners who are extracting ground water, (v) to direct respondent no.
1 to close down shop no.
8 operating as a liquor shop and (vi) to direct UPPCB to take stringent action against all the respondents.
O.A.
No.
744/2023 Deepak Kumar Vs.
GDA & Ors. -2- 2.
The applicants have not impleaded the concerned project proponents and have not enclosed copies of the relevant documents.
3.
In the course of hearing learned Counsel for the applicant seek permission to withdraw the same with liberty to file fresh application on the same cause of action with better particulars by impleading the necessary parties.
4.
In view of the above the application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
Arun Kumar Tyagi, JM Dr.
Afroz Ahmad, EM December 20th, 2023 N