UMESH KUMAR SINGH vs STATE OF CHATTISGARH
Party Details
- UMESH KUMAR SINGH
- STATE OF CHATTISGARH
Case Summary
UMESH KUMAR SINGH filed Case No. Review Application No. 5/2023 in the National Green Tribunal on 8 Sept 2023 against STATE OF CHATTISGARH. The case has undergone 2 hearings. The case is currently pending. 2 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (2)
- 6NOV 2023Hearing
Judge: Mr. Justice Sudhir Agarwal Dr. Afroz Ahmad
- Hearing
Judge: Mr. Justice Sudhir Agarwal Dr. Afroz Ahmad
Orders (2)
- 24NOV 2023judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 2
- 6NOV 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: 1
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
1 Item No.05 BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH, BHOPAL (By Virtual Mode) Review Application No.05/2023(CZ) IN Original Application No.76/2023(CZ) Umesh Kumar Singh Applicant(s) Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.
Respondent(s) Date of hearing: 24.11.2023 CORAM: HON’BLE MR.
JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR.
AFROZ AHMAD, EXPERT MEMBER For applicant(s) : Mr.
Rameshwar Sugandhi, Advocate for review applicant (through VC) ORDER 1.
This review application has been filed by original applicant Shri Umesh Kumar Singh, seeking review of our judgment dated 17.08.2023 passed in Original Application (hereinafter referred to as ‘OA’) 76/2023 (CZ) whereby OA was dismissed.
2.
Learned Counsel appearing for review applicant has again prayed that Tribunal should constitute a Committee comprising of Commissioners, Collectors and review applicant to take samples and submit report to Tribunal with chemical analysis.
The reasons for not accepting the review applicant’s request that it should be allowed/permitted to inspect the industrial premises and submit report, have already been given in our order and no manifest error in the judgment has been pointed out despite repeated queries by this Tribunal.
2 3.
Review application is not an occasion to allow review applicant an opportunity to re-argue the matter.
It is not within the scope of review.
Review lie only when a glaring error in the judgment is pointed out and not to give an opportunity to the applicant to re-argue the matter.
4.
We, therefore, find no merit in the application, hence dismissed.
Sudhir Agarwal, JM Dr.
Afroz Ahmad, EM November 24, 2023 Review Application No.05/2023(CZ) In Original Application No.76/2023(CZ) R