Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

Ms The Ramco Cements Limited vs Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited

Case NumberRP/10/2025
Date of Filing7 Aug 2025
Case TypeReview Petition
Last Hearing7 Apr 2026
StateKarnataka
CityBengaluru
Year of Filing2025

Party Details

Petitioner
  • MS THE RAMCO CEMENTS LIMITED Not Applicable AGED ABOUT 68 YEARSNot ApplicableNOT APPLICABLEAURAS CORPORATE CENTRE
  • V FLOOR
  • 98-A
  • DR.RADHAKRISHNAN SALAI
  • MYLAPORE
  • CHENNAI- 600 004600004
Respondent
  • BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLEK.R CIRCLE
  • BENGALURU560 001560001

Case Summary

MS THE RAMCO CEMENTS LIMITED Not Applicable AGED ABOUT 68 YEARSNot ApplicableNOT APPLICABLEAURAS CORPORATE CENTRE and V FLOOR filed Case No. RP/10/2025 in the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commision on 7 Aug 2025 against BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLEK.R CIRCLE and BENGALURU560 001560001. The case has undergone 9 hearings over 7 months. The case is currently pending.

Hearing History (9)

  • 7APR 2026
    Case called for arguments on 07.04.2026. Counsel for petitioner Sri. C.Vivek, on behalf of Smt. Poonam Patil and submits that their part of argument is over. Counsel for R-1 Sri. Sumanth K. Gowda for Precinct Legal & counsel for R-3 Ms. Kusuma present. R-2 not represented. Counsel for R-1 addressed arguments on merits of the case and concluded. Counsel for R-3 has adopted the arguments of R-1 through filing memo dated 07.04.2026. Commission heard the counsels, noted their arguments and reserved the case for orders with liberty to file their written submissions if any.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 17MAR 2026
    Case called for arguments on 17.03.2026. Counsel for petitioner C. Vivek present. Counsel for R-1 Sri. Sumanth K. Gowda for Precinct Legal present. Counsel for R-2 Sri. Rahul Shaji present on behalf of Sri. Samarth Kashyap through video conferencing. Counsel Ms. Dhanisha present for R-3. Commission noted that since the arguments of Review Petition to be heard by the full bench, the case is adjourned. For arguments on 07.04.2026.

    Judge: Two Members Bench - HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 17FEB 2026
    Case called for hearing on 17.02.2026. Counsel for petitioner Smt. Poonam Patil present and made submissions on merits of the case. Counsel for R-1 Deeksha Pherwani for Precinct Legal present, submits that statement of objections is filed in the registry on 29.01.2026 with a copy to petitioner and prays time to address arguments. Counsel for R-2 Sri. Rahul Shaji present on behalf of Sri. Samarth Kashyap through video conferencing. Counsel Ms. Dhanisha present for R-3. Commission heard the counsels and granted time. For arguments, call on 17.03.2026.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR STATEMENT OF OBJECTIONS

  • 27JAN 2026
    Case called for hearing on 27.01.2026. Counsel for petitioner Ms. Keerthana M. present. Counsel for R-1Sri. Sumanth Gowda for Precinct Legal present and prays one-week time to file statement of objections. Counsel for R-2 Sri. Anubav Mishra present through video conferencing on behalf of Sri. Samarth Kashyap. No representation for R-3. Commission heard the counsels and granted time for R-1 to file objections within a week with a copy to petitioner for filing rejoinder if any. Call on 17.02.2026.

    Judge: Two Members Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)

    Stage: FOR STATEMENT OF OBJECTIONS

  • 20JAN 2026
    Case called for hearing on 20.01.2026. Counsel for petitioner Ms. Keerthana M. present. Counsel for R-1 Ms. Stephania Pinto for Precinct Legal and prays one-week time to file statement of objections. No representation from R-2 & R-3. Commission granted time for R-1 to file objections with a copy to petitioner for filing rejoinder if any. Call on 27.01.2026.

    Judge: Two Members Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)

    Stage: FOR STATEMENT OF OBJECTIONS

  • 16DEC 2025
    Case called for hearing on 16.12.2025. Counsel for petitioner Sri. Vivek present on behalf of Smt. Poonam Patil. Counsel for R-1 Sri. Sumanth K. Gowda for Precinct Legal present and prays time to file statement of objections. R-2 Counsel Sri. Anubav Mishra present through video conferencing and submits that R-2 does not wish to file any objections, instead an affidavit and written submissions would be filed at a later stage if necessary. R-3 not present. Commission heard the counsels and granted time for R-1 to file statement of objections with a copy to petitioner for filing rejoinder if any. Call on 20.01.2026.

    Judge: Two Members Bench - HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR STATEMENT OF OBJECTIONS

  • 18NOV 2025
    Case called for hearing on admission 18.11.2025. Counsel for petitioner Ms. Shivani for Smt. Poonam Patil present. Proxy counsel Ms. Stephanio Pinto present on behalf of Sri. Samarth Kashyap present for R2. Ms. Nayana Tara filed Vakalath for R3 (KPTCL). Counsel for respondents prays for time to file objections. Commission heard the counsels, granted time to file objections, call on 16.12.2025.

    Judge: Single Member Bench - HKJ(L)

    Stage: FOR ADMISSION AND APPEARANCE OF RESPONDENT(S)

  • 23SEP 2025
    Case called for hearing on admission on 23.09.2025. Counsel for petitioner Smt. Poonam Patil present, made submission to provide an opportunity of being heard by both the parties on the issue of limitation in OP No. 21/2024 which was dismissed on the sole ground of limitation and prays to admit the present review petition. Commission heard the counsel for review petitioner, verified the order sheet in OP No. 21/2024, pending admission of the review petition, directed the registry to issue notice to the respondent. Call on 18.11.2025.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR HEARING ON ADMISSION

  • 2SEP 2025
    Case called for hearing on admission of Review Petition on 02.09.2025. Counsel Smt. Poonam Patil appeared for petitioner, made submissions for Review of the order of the Commission dated 17.06.2025 in OP No.21/2024 as the Commission dismissed the said petition on the ground of limitation without giving an opportunity to the petitioner to made their submission on the point of limitation and no objections were raised by the Respondents on the point of limitation in response to the memo dated 21.09.2024 filed by the petitioner on limitation and prays to admit the Review Petition. Commission heard the counsel, noted the submissions and directed the registry to put up the original file in OP No. 21/2024 before the Commission for appropriate decision on the maintainability, pending admission of the Review Petition. Call on 23.09.2025.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR ADMISSION