NA Tadas Wind Energy private Limited vs Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited

Hearing History (5)

• 7APR 2026
  Case called for hearing on 07.04.2026. Counsel for petitioner Ms. Shweta Shrimal for Saakshya Law Offices present. Counsel for R-1 Ms. Deeksha Pherwani for Precinct Legal present and filed statement of objections with a copy to petitioner. Petitioner counsel prays two weeks’ time to file rejoinder. Commission having heard the counsels, granted time to file ejoinder. Call on 02.06.2026.

  Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

  Stage: FOR STATEMENT OF OBJECTIONS

• 17FEB 2026
  Case called for hearing on 17.02.2026. Counsel for petitioner Ms. Sweta Shrimal for Saakshya Law Offices present. Counsel for R-1 Ms. Deeksha Pherwani for Precinct Legal present and prays two weeks’ time to file statement of objections. No representation from NLDC Grid India. Commission heard the counsels and granted time for R-1 to file objections with a copy to petitioner for filing rejoinder if any. Call on 07.04.2026.

  Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

  Stage: FOR STATEMENT OF OBJECTIONS

• 6JAN 2026
  Case called for hearing on 06.01.2026. Counsel for petitioner Ms. Sweta Shrimal for Saakshya Law Offices present. Counsel Ms. Stephania Pinto for Precinct Legal present submits that vakalth for R-1 (KPTCL/SLDC) is filed in the registry on 05.01.2026 and prays three weeks’ time to file statement of objections. No representation from the side NLDC, Grid India, in spite of service of notice. Commission heard the counsels and granted time for contesting respondent to file statement of objections with a copy to petitioner for filing rejoinder if any. Call on 17.02.2026.

  Judge: Two Members Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)

  Stage: FOR APPEARANCE OF RESPONDENT(S)

• 9DEC 2025
  The case had been re-scheduled from 25.11.2025 and called for hearing on 09.12.2025. Counsel for petitioner Ms. Swathi for Adithya Narayan for Saakshya Law Present. Despite service of notice respondents are not present. Commission has directed the registry to issue one more notice to the respondents. Call on 06.01.2026.

  Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

  Stage: FOR APPEARANCE OF RESPONDENT(S)

• 23SEP 2025
  Case is called for hearing on admission on 23.09.2025. Petitioner counsel Sri. Aditya Narayan for Saakshya Law present, made submissions for grant of single application for standing clearance under STOA for their power plant having a capacity of 80.8 MW connected to one interconnection point having common evacuation scheme instead of seeking seven applications for issue of standing clearances. Further, submits that since Respondent No.1(KPTCL) refused to grant the same, the petitioner had filed petition No. 223/MP/2023 before the Hon’ble CERC. The CERC in its order dated 28.07.2023 directed the Respondent No.1 herein to grant clearance, based on which respondent-KPTCL granted standing clearance to the petitioner from August, 2023. Further, the counsel submits that Hon’ble CERC while disposing the said petition on 07.07.2025 observed that the issue involved in the case, i.e. grant of standing clearance to the Petitioner to use of the intra-State transmission network of the KPTCL, is related to the intra-State transmission network in terms of Section 86 of the Act, the issue under this Petition falls under the jurisdiction of the State Commission. Therefore, the Petitioner was directed to approach the concerned State Commission for adjudication of the issues under this Petition. Further, the petitioner counsel submits that Respondent-KPTCL had already granted standing clearance for STOA to the petitioner on the basis of single application in the past without insisting upon different application for each group and prays to continue the interim order dated 28.07.2023 granted by Hon’ble CERC vide Annexure-AB and to admit the petition. Commission heard the petitioner counsel, noted the submissions, admitted the petition. Further, on perusal of Annexure-AB, the Commission felt that interim protection is needs to be issued to protect the interest of the petitioner as ordered by the Hon’ble CERC in it order dated 28.07.2023 in petition No. 223/MP/2023 before the Hon’ble CERC. Hence, the Commission is of the opinion that the interim relief granted by the Hon’ble CERC in it order dated 28.07.2023 shall be deemed to be an interim order passed by this Commission today till further orders. The registry is detected to issue notice to the respondents. Call on 25.11.2025.

  Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

  Stage: FOR ADMISSION