Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

Mr Vikas Lodha vs Karnataka Power transmission corporation limited

Case NumberOP/17/2025
Date of Filing27 May 2025
Case TypeOriginal Petition
Last Hearing28 Apr 2026
StateKarnataka
CityBengaluru
Year of Filing2025

Party Details

Petitioner
  • MR VIKAS LODHAAGED ABOUT 54 YEARSMANGALAM HOUSE
  • 5
  • 5TH CROSS
  • H. SIDDAIAH ROAD
  • NEAR LALBAGH
  • 560027
Respondent
  • KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITEDNOT APPLICABLE MANAGING DIRECTORKARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITEDKAVERI BHAVAN 4TH FLOOR
  • 560009

Case Summary

MR VIKAS LODHAAGED ABOUT 54 YEARSMANGALAM HOUSE and 5 filed Case No. OP/17/2025 in the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commision on 27 May 2025 against KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITEDNOT APPLICABLE MANAGING DIRECTORKARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITEDKAVERI BHAVAN 4TH FLOOR and 560009. The case has undergone 10 hearings over 9 months. The case is currently pending.

Hearing History (10)

  • 28APR 2026
    Case called for arguments of Respondents on 28.04.2026. Counsel for Petitioner Sri. Ajajy Nandalike for Pragathi Law Chambers present. Counsel for R-1 & R-2 Ms. Diksha Pherwani for Precinct Legal present and addressed arguments in part. Petitioner counsel replied for arguments of R-1 & R-2. Respondent counsel prays time for further arguments. Commission having noted the submissions of both counsels, granted time for further arguments, call on 09.06.2026.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 7APR 2026
    Case called for arguments on 07.04.2026. Counsel for petitioner Sri. Ajay Nandalike for Pragathi Law Chambers and counsel for R-1 & R-2 Ms. Stephania Pinto for Precinct Legal present. Petitioner counsel addressed arguments and concluded. Respondent counsel prays for time to address arguments on the next date of hearing. Commission having heard the arguments of petitioner, granted time for Respondents to address arguments. For arguments of R-1 & R-2, call on 28.04.2026.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 17MAR 2026
    Case called for arguments on 17.03.2026. Counsel for petitioner Sri. Akshith present on behalf of Sri. Ajay Nandalike for Pragathi Law Chambers and prays time to address arguments. Counsel for Respondents Ms. Deeksha Pherwani for Precinct Legal present. Commission having noted the submissions of the counsel and granted time to address arguments. For arguments, call on 07.04.2026.

    Judge: Two Members Bench - HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 17FEB 2026
    Case called for arguments on 17.02.2026. Counsel for petitioner Sri. Akshith present on behalf of Sri. Ajay Nadalike and prays time to address arguments. Counsel for Respondent Ms. Deeksha Pherwani for Precinct Legal present. Commission granted time to address arguments. Call on 17.03.2026.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 27JAN 2026
    Case called for hearing on 27.01.2026. Counsel for petitioner Ms. Manasa for Pragathi Law Chambers present and filed rejoinder with a copy to R-1 & R-2. Both counsels pray for time to address arguments. Commission heard the counsels and granted time. For arguments, call on 17.02.2026.

    Judge: Two Members Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)

    Stage: FOR REJOINDER

  • 6JAN 2026
    Case called for hearing on 06.01.2026. Counsel for petitioner Ms. Manasa for Pragathi Law Chambers present and prays two weeks’ time for filing rejoinder. Counsel for R-1 Ms. Stephania Pinto for Precinct Legal present. Commission heard the counsels and granted time for petitioner to file rejoinder if any. Call on 27.01.2026.

    Judge: Two Members Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)

    Stage: FOR REJOINDER

  • 9DEC 2025
    The case had been re-scheduled from 25.11.2025 and called for hearing on 09.12.2025. Counsel for petitioner Sri Akshith present for Ajay J Nandalike for Pragati Law Chambers. Counsel for respondent Sri Sumanth Gowda present for Shahbaaz Hussain for Precinct Legal and submits that statement of objections for R1 filed in the registry on 24.11. 2025 with a copy to respondent and prays to take same on record. Petitioner counsel prays time to file rejoinder. Commission heard the counsels, granted time to file rejoinder. Call on 06.01.2026.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR STATEMENT OF OBJECTIONS

  • 23SEP 2025
    Case called for hearing on 23.09.2025. Counsel for petitioner Ms. Saakshi Prem present, filed IA dated 23.09.2025 with a copy to R-1 & R-2, prays to take the same on record and to allow the IA. Counsel for Respondents Sri. Sumanth K. Gowda for Precinct Legal present, filed statement of objections of R-2 with a copy to petitioner, says no objection for allowing IA and prays time to file objections for R-1. Commission heard both counsels, noted their submission on amendment application and allowed the amendment application, directed the petitioner counsel to carry out the amendment in the original petition and to file amended petition with a copy to the respondents. Further, granted time to the Respondent No. 1 to file objections. Call on 25.11.2025.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR STATEMENT OF OBJECTIONS

  • 12AUG 2025
    Case called for hearing on 12.08.2025. Counsel Ms. Sanjana S. Jain present for petitioner on behalf Sri. Ajay J. Nandalike. Counsel Ms. Diksha for Precinct Legal appeared for R-1 (KPTCL) duly filing vakalath in the registry on 11.08.2025, undertakes to file vakalath for R-2 (MESCOM) and prays three weeks’ time to file statement of objections. Commission heard the counsels and granted time for R-1 & R-2 to file objections with a copy to petitioner. Call on 23.09.2025.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR APPEARANCE OF RESPONDENT(S)

  • 15JUL 2025
    Case called for admission on 15.07.2025. Counsel Sri. Ajay J. Nadalike appeared for petitioner, made submissions for admission of the petition to compensate the petitioner for certain units of energy injected into the grid between 15.10.2022 to 02.06.2023 due to non-execution of W&B agreement by the designated authorities owing to jurisdictional issue between CESC & MESCOM despite energy consumed and required formalities are complied and prays for admission of the petition. Commission heard the counsel, noted the submissions, admitted the petition and directed the registry to issue notice to the Respondents. Call on 12.08.2025.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR ADMISSION