Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

NA JINDAL ALUMINUM LIMITED vs BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED

Case NumberOP/44/2024
Date of Filing12 Dec 2024
Case TypeOriginal Petition
Last Hearing2 Sept 2025
StateKarnataka
CityBengaluru
Year of Filing2024

Party Details

Petitioner
  • NA JINDAL ALUMINUM LIMITED JINDAL NAGAR
  • 16 K M
  • TUMKUR ROAD BENGALURU-560073560073
Respondent
  • BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED MANAGING DIRECTORBANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LTD.
  • K.R CIRCLE
  • BENGALURU-560001560001

Case Summary

NA JINDAL ALUMINUM LIMITED JINDAL NAGAR and 16 K M filed Case No. OP/44/2024 in the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commision on 12 Dec 2024 against BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED MANAGING DIRECTORBANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. and K.R CIRCLE. The case has undergone 8 hearings over 7 months. The case is currently pending.

Hearing History (8)

  • 2SEP 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDERS

  • 29JUL 2025
    Case called for arguments on 29.07.2025. Counsel Sri. Badrinath present for petitioner on behalf of Sri. Shridhar Prabhu for Navayana Law Offices. Counsel for Respondents Ms. Stephina Pinto for Precinct Legal present and addressed arguments on merits of the case with relevant orders of the Commission dated 17.06.2025 in OP No. 17/2024 and concluded. Petitioner counsel prays time to file written submissions. Commission heard the arguments of Respondents and reserved the case for orders with liberty to file written submissions by both the parties, if any within a weeks’ time.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 22JUL 2025
    Case called for arguments on 22.07.2025. Counsel for petitioner Sri. Shridhar Prabhu for Navayana Law Offices present and addressed arguments on the merits of the case on his part. Counsel for Respondents Sri. Sumanth K. Gowda for Precinct Legal present and prays time to address arguments on the next date of hearing. Commission heard arguments of petitioner counsel and granted time for Respondent to address arguments. For arguments of Respondent, call on 29.07.2025.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 1JUL 2025
    Case called for arguments on 01.07.2025. Counsel for petitioner Ms. Vaishnavi on behalf of Sri. Shridhar Prabhu for Navayana Law Offices and prays for time to address arguments. Counsel for R1 and R2 Ms. Deeksha for Precinct Legal present. Commission heard the counsels, granted time. For arguments, call on 22.07.2025.

    Judge: Single Member Bench - JA(M)

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 3JUN 2025
    Case called for hearing on 03.06.2025. Petitioner counsel Ms. Sharvari N for Sri. Sridhar Prabhu present. Counsel for respondents Ms. Stephania Pinto for Precinct Legal present. Petitioner counsel prays for time to address the arguments. Time granted. For arguments, call on 01.07.2025.

    Judge: Two Members Bench - HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 15APR 2025
    Case called for hearing on 15.04.2025. Counsel for Petitioner Ms. Vaishnavi present on behalf of Sri. Shridhar Prabhu for Navayana Law Offices. Counsel for R-1 & R-2 Ms. Stephania Pinto for Precinct Legal present, submits that statement of objections for R-1 is filed on 03.04.2025 in the registry with a copy to petitioner and further submits that R-2 is a formal party and hence does not wish to file any objections and prays to take the same on record. Both counsels pray for time to address arguments. Commission heard counsels and granted time. For arguments, call on 03.06.2025.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR APPEARANCE OF RESPONDENT(S) AND OBJECTIONS

  • 4MAR 2025
    Case called for hearing on 04.03.2025. Counsel Sri. Badrinath present on behalf of Sri. Shridhar Prabhu for Navayana Law Offices and prays for adjournment. Counsel for Respondent Ms. Stephania Pinto for Precinct Legal present, submits that statement of objections is filed in the registry on 03.03.2025 with a copy to petitioner and made submissions on merits of the case. No representation from KPTCL. Commission heard the counsels and granted time for petitioner and directed the registry to issue notice to KPTCL. Call on 15.04.2025.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR APPEARANCE OF RESPONDENT(S)

  • 7JAN 2025
    Case called for admission on 07.01.2025. Counsel Sri. Shridhar Prabhu for Navayana Law Office present for petitioner, made submissions for refund of certain units of energy wheeled to the grid from 01.10.2022 to 09.01.2023 although timely procedures are being followed. Further made submissions on the reliance of the orders of the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka dated 15.04.2024 in WP No. 21755/2023 and prays to admit the petition. Commission heard the counsel, noted the submissions, perused the relevant records, admitted the petition and directed the registry to issue notice to the Respondents. Call on 04.03.2025.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR ADMISSION