Ms Jindal Aluminium Limited vs Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited
Case NumberOP/8/2021
Date of Filing3 Feb 2021
Case TypeOriginal Petition
Last Hearing--
CourtKarnataka Electricity Regulatory Commision
StateKarnataka
CityBengaluru
Year of Filing--
Party Details
Petitioner
M
s
J
i
n
d
a
l
A
l
u
m
i
n
i
u
m
L
i
m
i
t
e
d
N
o
t
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
Respondent
M
s
B
a
n
g
a
l
o
r
e
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
i
t
y
S
u
p
p
l
y
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
L
i
m
i
t
e
d
N
o
t
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
Hearing History (3)
31JAN
2024
Case is called for hearing on 31.01.2024. Counsel for the petitioner Sri Siddaveer Chakki for Navayana Law Officers present. Counsel for Respondent Ms. Stephania Pinto for legal precinct present. The petitioner counsel made submission that they have not consumed 51% of the energy generated by the captive plant to consider the petitioner as a captive consumer as per the provisions of the Electricity Rules, 2005., hence, prays for disposal of the petition. Commission heard the petitioner counsel and considering the submission of petitioner advocate as above, disposed off the petition and the claim of the respondent for cross subsidy charges and electricity tax is upheld.
Judge: Two Members Bench - PRK(C)+MDR(M)
Stage: FOR HEARING
23JAN
2024
Case is called for hearing on 23.01.2024. Counsel for petitioner Sri. Siddaveer Chakki for Navayana Law Offices present, made oral submissions on the merits of the case in respect of captive status of the petitioner’s plant and prays for further time to make clarification on Respondent’s objection and on the captive generation and captive consumption on the next date of hearing upon receiving instructions from their client. Counsel for Respondent Ms. Stephania Pinto for Precinct Legal present. Call on 31.01.2024.