Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

NA Radiance Solar Pvt Ltd vs Bangalore Electricity Supply Co Ltd

Case NumberOP/15/2024
Date of Filing5 Jul 2024
Case TypeOriginal Petition
Last Hearing13 Jan 2026
StateKarnataka
CityBengaluru
Year of Filing2024

Party Details

Petitioner
  • Radiance Solar Pvt. Ltd. v. Bangalore Electricity Supply Co. Ltd.
Respondent
  • RADIANCE SOLAR PVT. LTD. v. BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CO LTDBANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LTD.
  • KR CIRCLEBENGALURU560001

Case Summary

Radiance Solar Pvt. Ltd. v. Bangalore Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. filed Case No. OP/15/2024 in the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commision on 5 Jul 2024 against RADIANCE SOLAR PVT. LTD. v. BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CO LTDBANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. and KR CIRCLEBENGALURU560001. The case has undergone 16 hearings over 1 year and 4 months. The case is currently pending.

Hearing History (16)

  • 13JAN 2026
    Case called for arguments on 13.01.2026. Counsel for petitioner Ms. Anusha Nagarajan and counsel for Respondent Ms. Vismaya Simha for Samyog Law present. Both counsels concurred for payment of agreed claims of SGD through incremental tariff. Further, both counsels addressed arguments on the claims of carrying cost on SGD and concluded. Commission heard the counsels and reserved the case for orders.

    Judge: Two Members Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 9DEC 2025
    Case called for hearing on 09.12.2025. Counsel for the petitioner Sri R.S. Anirudh for Anusha Nagarajan present. Counsel for respondent Ms. Vismaya Simha for Sumana Naganand for Samyog Law present. Both counsels pray for time to address arguments on carrying cost. Commission heard counsels, granted time. call 13.01.2026.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 11NOV 2025
    Case called for arguments on 11.11.2025. Counsel for petitioner Ms. Pooja present on behalf of Ms. Anusha Nagarajan and counsel for Respondent Ms. Vismaya Simha for Samyog Law present. Petitioner counsel submits that consequent upon reconciliation of claims of SGD, agreed claims would be paid to the Respondent in instalments month on month basis. As regards the claims of carrying costs on SGD, both parties agreed for mutual settlement of in consultation with their respective clients on the carrying cost and hence prays for time. Respondent counsel concurs for the same. Commission heard both parties and granted time. Call on 09.12.2025.

    Judge: Two Members Bench - HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 14OCT 2025
    Case called for hearing on arguments on 14.10.2025. Counsel Ms. Pooja present on behalf of Ms. Anusha Nagarajan for petitioner. Counsel for respondent Ms. Vishmaya Simha for Samyog Law present and prays for time to address arguments on the issue of carrying Cost on the next date hearing and also to submit the mode of payment. Commission heard the counsels, granted time. Call on 11.11.2025.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 23SEP 2025
    Case called for hearing on 23.09.2025. Counsel for petitioner Sri. R.S. Anirudh present. Counsel for Respondent Ms. Vismaya simha for Samyog Law present, submits that memo for adjournment is filed in the registry on 22.09.2025 seeking two weeks’ time to decide the mode of payment of admitted claims either in instalments or in one lump sum is placed before the MD, BESCOM and waiting for approval. On the issue of Carrying Cost, Respondent Counsel sought time to argue. Commission heard the counsels, granted time. Call on 14.10.2025.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR HEARING

  • 9SEP 2025
    Case called for hearing on 09.09.2025. Counsel for petitioner Sri. Anirudh R.S. present on behalf of Ms. Anusha Nagarajan, filed additional affidavit dated 06.09.2025 detailing the impact of claims arrived on account of SGD consequent to reconciliation of claims agreed between the parties, prays to take the same on record, further prays for determination of carrying cost on the claims of SGD and prays for time to make submissions on the same. Counsel for Respondent Ms. Vismaya Simha for Just Law present, agreed to pay the claims of SGD either in instalments or in one lump sum duly seeking instructions from the client and prays two weeks’ time. Further, objected for payment of carrying cost as the same was not contemplated in the PPA or in the original petition and pray for time to argue the same on the next date of hearing. Commission heard both the counsels, noted their submissions, granted time for respondent to decide on the payment terms of the agreed claims of SGD. For compliance and hearing on carrying cost, call on 23.09.2025.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR HEARING

  • 29JUL 2025
    Case called for hearing on 29.07.2025. Counsel Ms. Pooja present for petitioner on behalf of Ms. Anusha Nagarajan. Counsel for Respondent Ms. Vismaya Simha for Just Law present and filed minutes of meeting by way of memo dated 29.07.2025 with a copy to the petitioner. Petitioner counsel prays four weeks’ time to reply to the minutes of meeting. Commission heard both the counsels and granted time for Respondents to file reply if any and call on 09.09.2025.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR HEARING

  • 8JUL 2025
    Case called for hearing on 08.07.2025. Counsel for petitioner Sri. Anirudh R.S. present. Counsel for Respondent Ms. Vismaya Simha present, submits that reconciliation of claims of petitioner is carried out in BESCOM in the light of available invoices and prays two weeks’ time to file minutes of the meeting. Commission heard the Respondent counsel and granted time. Call on 29.07.2025.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR HEARING

  • 3JUN 2025
    Case called for arguments on 03.06.2025. Petitioner counsel Sri. Anish for MS. Anusha Nagarajan is present and filed rejoinder with a copy to respondent. Counsel for respondent Ms. Vishmaya Simha for Smt. Sumana Naganand for Just Law present. Petitioner counsel submitted that reconciliation is under process and prays time to submit the report. The case is adjourned to report about and for further hearing. Call on 08.07.2025.

    Judge: Two Members Bench - HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 25MAR 2025
    Case called for arguments on 25.03.2025. Counsel for petitioner Ms. Pooja present on behalf of Ms. Anusha Nagarajan for Olive Law and prays two weeks’ time to file rejoinder and to address arguments. Counsel for Respondent Smt. Sumana Naganand for Just Law present and made submissions on the merits of the case. Commission heard both counsels and granted time for arguments. Further, directed the parties to reconcile the claim by the petitioner in the light of available invoices at BESCOM, Corporate Office within four weeks from today and to submit the reconciled report to the Commission on or before 28.04.2025. For arguments, call on 03.06.2025.

    Judge: Two Members Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 4MAR 2025
    Case called for arguments on 04.03.2025. Counsel Ms. Pooja appeared on behalf of Anusha Nagarajan for Olive Law and filed memo dated 04.03.2025 seeking for adjournment. Counsel for Respondent Ms. Vismaya Simha for Just Law present and submits that statement of objections is filed in the registry on 19.02.2025 with a copy to petitioner. Commission Granted time for both counsels for arguments. Call on 25.03.2025.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS

  • 7JAN 2025
    Case called for hearing on 07.01.2025. Counsel for petitioner Sri. Anirudh R.S. present, filed memo dated 07.01.2025 reporting inordinate delay in filing objections by the respondent. Counsel for Respondent Ms. Vismaya Simha for Just Law present and prays one-week time to file objections as the process of seeking approval from respondent is in the pipe line. Commission granted time to Respondent to file objections on or before 15.01.2025 with a copy to Respondent for filing rejoinder if any. For arguments, call on 04.03.2025.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR STATEMENT OF OBJECTIONS

  • 3DEC 2024
    Case called for hearing on 03.12.2024. Counsel for petitioner Sri. R.S. Anirudh for Olive Law present. Counsel for Respondent Ms. Vismaya Simha for Just Law present, undertakes to file vakalath and statement of objections within a weeks’ time with a copy to petitioner. Petitioner counsel prays to file rejoinder after receipt of objections. Commission heard counsels, granted time to both counsels. Call on 07.01.2025.

    Judge: Single Member Bench - JA(M)

    Stage: FOR STATEMENT OF OBJECTIONS

  • 12NOV 2024
    Case called for hearing on 12.11.2024. Counsel for petitioner Sri. R.S.Anirudh for Olive Law present. Counsel Ms. Vismaya Simha for Just Law appeared for Respondent, undertook to file vakalath and prays four weeks’ time to file statement of objections with a copy to other side. Granted time to file objections. Call on 03.12.2024.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR APPEARANCE OF RESPONDENT(S)

  • 22OCT 2024
    Case called for hearing on 22.10.2024. Counsel Sri. R.S. Anirudh for Olive Law present. No representation from Respondent BESCOM despite service of notice. Commission directed the registry to issue one more notice. Call on 12.11.2024.

    Judge: Two Members Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)

    Stage: FOR APPEARANCE OF RESPONDENT(S)

  • 27AUG 2024
    Case called for admission on 27.08.2024. Counsel Ms. Anusha Nagarajan appeared for petitioner, made submissions seeking compensation for change in law event in terms of Article 15 of PPA consequent of imposition of SGD Notification by GoI dated 30.07.2018. Further submits with relevant facts substantiating on the point of limitation in filing the present petition before the Commission and prays to admit the petition. Commission heard the counsel, noted the submissions, perused the facts, admitted the petition and directed the registry to issue notice to the Respondent. Call on 22.10.2024.

    Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)

    Stage: FOR ADMISSION