CNR: --
PENDING
NA Radiance Solar Pvt Ltd vs Bangalore Electricity Supply Co Ltd
Case NumberOP/15/2024
Date of Filing5 Jul 2024
Case TypeOriginal Petition
Last Hearing13 Jan 2026
StateKarnataka
CityBengaluru
Year of Filing2024
Party Details
Petitioner
- Radiance Solar Pvt. Ltd. v. Bangalore Electricity Supply Co. Ltd.
Respondent
- RADIANCE SOLAR PVT. LTD. v. BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CO LTDBANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LTD.
- KR CIRCLEBENGALURU560001
Case Summary
Radiance Solar Pvt. Ltd. v. Bangalore Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. filed Case No. OP/15/2024 in the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commision on 5 Jul 2024 against RADIANCE SOLAR PVT. LTD. v. BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CO LTDBANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. and KR CIRCLEBENGALURU560001. The case has undergone 16 hearings over 1 year and 4 months. The case is currently pending.
Hearing History (16)
- 13JAN 2026Case called for arguments on 13.01.2026. Counsel for petitioner Ms. Anusha Nagarajan and counsel for Respondent Ms. Vismaya Simha for Samyog Law present. Both counsels concurred for payment of agreed claims of SGD through incremental tariff. Further, both counsels addressed arguments on the claims of carrying cost on SGD and concluded. Commission heard the counsels and reserved the case for orders.
Judge: Two Members Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)
Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS
- 9DEC 2025Case called for hearing on 09.12.2025. Counsel for the petitioner Sri R.S. Anirudh for Anusha Nagarajan present. Counsel for respondent Ms. Vismaya Simha for Sumana Naganand for Samyog Law present. Both counsels pray for time to address arguments on carrying cost. Commission heard counsels, granted time. call 13.01.2026.
Judge: Full Bench - PRK(C)+HKJ(L)+JA(M)
Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS
- 11NOV 2025Case called for arguments on 11.11.2025. Counsel for petitioner Ms. Pooja present on behalf of Ms. Anusha Nagarajan and counsel for Respondent Ms. Vismaya Simha for Samyog Law present. Petitioner counsel submits that consequent upon reconciliation of claims of SGD, agreed claims would be paid to the Respondent in instalments month on month basis. As regards the claims of carrying costs on SGD, both parties agreed for mutual settlement of in consultation with their respective clients on the carrying cost and hence prays for time. Respondent counsel concurs for the same. Commission heard both parties and granted time. Call on 09.12.2025.
Judge: Two Members Bench - HKJ(L)+JA(M)
Stage: FOR ARGUMENTS