PILLI LAKSHMI vs THE STATE OF AP

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION No.6450 of 2023 Smt.

Pilli Lakshmi, W/o.

Pilli Nooka Raju, Aged about 68 years, D.No.51/14/23, Kranthi Nagar, Near Sharada Vidya Nilayam, Nakkavanipalem, P & Tahsildar Colony, Visakhapatnaam Urban, Visakhapatnam. … Petitioner And The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh & 2 others. ...

Respondents ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents.

2.

The grievance of the writ petitioner is that, the application made by her dated 02.02.2023 has not been disposed of so far, by the 2nd respondent for deletion of the subject property from the prohibited list.

3.

The counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner purchased the subject plots under the registered Sale Deeds dated 03.10.1991 and 19.08.1992 and the 2 petitioner also paid.

The petitioner made Meeseva Application No.TTA012300103578 dated 02.02.2023 for the said plots.

For regularization of the unapproved plot Nos.29, 30, 31, 32 and 33 in Sy.No.33/2P and 33/2B of Bakkavanipalem, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, she also obtained approval vide proceedings in Rc.No.327/2010/L5 dated 25.02.2011.

The building permission and construction permission was also granted by the Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation for the subject property vide proceedings dated 28.07.2011.

While so, suddenly behind the back of the petitioner, without following the due procedure, the respondent authorities placed the subject property under the prohibited list as per the Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908 causing hardship and irreparable loss to the petitioner in proceeding with the subject property.

In view of the same, she filed Meeseva Application No.TTA012300103578 dated 02.02. ted 02.02.2023 to delete the subject property from the prohibited list but the same is not done.

On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents submits 3 that, the 2nd respondent would consider and dispose of the application of the petitioner dated 02.02.2023 by following the due procedure.

4.

In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the application made by the petitioner No.TTA0123001023578 dated 02.02.2023 as expeditiously as possible, strictly in accordance with law within a period of four (04) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

It is needless to mention here that, all the parties concerned shall be heard including the petitioner herein and upon verification of the records of the subject plots, official decision shall be taken strictly in accordance with law.

5.

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 16.03.2023 CVD