Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

LAKKIDAPU APPALLA KONDA vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

Case NumberWP 1431/2023
Date of Filing23 Jan 2023
Case TypeWP
Last Hearing2 May 2023
State--
City--
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • LAKKIDAPU APPALLA KONDA
  • Lakkidapu Yerukulamma
  • Kovvuru Bala
  • Mamidi Pydithalli
  • Kondala Nagamani
  • Sudha Ramanamma
  • Jaala Simhachalam
  • Mulaparthi Satyavathi
  • Paluri Adilaxmi
  • Pidugu Anjaneyulu
  • Landa Lakshmi
  • Mirapa Viramma
  • Lakkidapu Ugadamma
  • Goka Yerramma
  • Savala Laxmi
  • Bonula Rambai
  • Palli Kanthamma
  • Nidugatla Padma
Respondent
  • THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
  • The District Collector
  • The Commissioner
  • The Tahsildar

Case Summary

LAKKIDAPU APPALLA KONDA and Lakkidapu Yerukulamma filed Case No. WP 1431/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 23 Jan 2023 against THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH and The District Collector. The case has had one hearing so far. The case is currently pending. 15 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (1)

  • 2MAY 2023
    Next Hearing

    Judge: N/A

Orders (15)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.1431 of 2023 Lakkidapu Appalla Konda, D/o Karu Syanyasi, aged about 52 years, R/o D.No.1, SC Colony, Bogguladibba, Cantonment Area, Vizianagaram Municipal Corporation, Vizianagaram District at Vizianagaram and 17 others. … Petitioners Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Municipal Administration, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District and three others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri M.

Lakshmi Narayana Counsel for respondents : GP for Municipal Administration and Urban Development; and Sri M.

Manohar Reddy, learned standing counsel. :: ORDER :: Petitioners eighteen in number filed the above writ petition complaining dispossession from their houses in survey No.612/P of Bogguladibba, Cantonment Area, Vizianagaram Municipal Corporation, Vizianagaram District.

Page 2 of 5 SRSJ WP No.1431 of 2023 2.

In the affidavit it was contended that petitioners have been residing in survey No.612/P of Bogguladibba, Cantonment Area, Vizianagaram Municipal District, since more than three decades.

Possession certificates were issued in favour of the petitioners and they have been paying house tax to the local authorities.

Petitioners also obtained electricity connection.

While things stood thus, respondent No.3 is trying to interfere with the petitioners’ possession, without issuing any notice.

Hence, the writ petition.

3.

Counter affidavit was filed on behalf of respondent No.3.

It was specifically contended in para No.8 of the counter affidavit that the petitioners encroached public road and respondent No.3 is empowered to remove such encroachers without issuing any notice under Section 405 of the A.P.

Municipal Corporation Act.

Some of the encroachers are making hectic efforts to make further constructions. tructions.

Out of eighteen encroachers, 14 persons have been provided with alternative accommodation under Government schemes.

Petitioners encroached road margin of sixty feet road and the present width of the road is 20 feet.

Eventually, prayed to dismiss the writ petition.

Page 3 of 5 SRSJ WP No.1431 of 2023 4.

Petitioners filed rejoinder, disputing the counter averments and stated that alternative accommodation is not suitable for living.

5.

Heard Sri M.

Lakshmi Narayana, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri G.

Naresh Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri M.

Manohar Reddy, learned standing counsel for respondent No.3.

6.

As seen from the material on record, there is no dispute that petitioners have been residing in houses/huts in survey No.612/P of Bogguladibba, Cantonment Area, Vizianagaram Municipal Corporation, Vizianagaram District.

In the counter affidavit filed by respondent No.3, it was specifically contended that petitioners encroached upon 60 feet of road margin.

In fact, it was also specifically stated that out of 18 encroachers, 14 persons were provided alternative accommodation for which rejoinder was filed by the petitioners stating that alternative accommodation is not suitable for living.

This Court is not adjudicating the issue as to whether the alternative accommodation provided is suitable or not in this writ petition.

Page 4 of 5 SRSJ WP No.1431 of 2023 7.

Thus, as seen from the pleadings, there is no dispute as to the petitioners’ residence in S.No.

612/P of Bogguladibba, Cantonment Area, Vizianagaram Municipal Corporation, Vizianagaram District.

If the petitioners encroached road margin and made constructions and if the same is objectionable, the authority concerned shall take steps in accordance with law.

Without following due process, the authorities shall not interfere with the petitioners’ possession.

8.

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

No costs.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 31.10.2023 ikn Page 5 of 5 SRSJ WP No.1431 of 2023 118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.1431 of 2023 Date : 31.10.2023 ikn