ALAPATI MEHAR vs THE GOV OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Party Details
- ALAPATI MEHAR
- THE GOV OF ANDHRA PRADESH
- The Commissioner of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development department
- The District Collector
- The Executive Engineer
- Project Director
- The Executive Engineer
- The Government of Andhra Pradesh
- The Union of India
- The Panasalapalem Grama Panchayat
Case Summary
ALAPATI MEHAR filed Case No. WP 5346/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 2 Mar 2023 against THE GOV OF ANDHRA PRADESH and The Commissioner of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development department. The case has had one hearing so far. The case was disposed of on 21 Mar 2023. 2 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (1)
- 21MAR 2023Next Hearing
Judge: N/A
Orders (2)
- 21MAR 2023judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 2
- 3MAR 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: 1
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No.5346 of 2023 Between:- Alapati Mehar …..
Petitioner and The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, and others …..
Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : M/s.V.V.N.V.
Teja Counsel for respondents : The G.P. for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development Department The G.P. for Finance & Planning The G.P. for Social Welfare ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development.
2.
The writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not releasing the bill amounts worth Rs.1,82,074/- with interest to the petitioner in respect of execution of various works in the Gram Panchayat as illegal, arbitrary, and for a consequential direction to the respondents to release and pay the said amount with interest forthwith.
2 3.
At the time of considering the matter, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development placed a copy of the instructions dated 20.3.2023 received from the 4th respondent, from a perusal of which, it would appear that there is no dispute with regard to the works executed by the petitioner and the amount claimed for the works executed.
4.
In view of the admitted position, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, with a direction to the respondents to arrange to pay the amount due to the petitioner, after effecting statutory deductions, if any, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
It is needless to say that the petitioner may claim interest, through appropriate proceedings.
5.
With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. nd closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA March 21, 2023 vasu