Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

RANDHI SRIDHAR PRABHU vs PATTANSHETTI RAVI SUBHASH,I.A.S

Case NumberCC 1584/2023
Date of Filing3 Mar 2023
Case Type-
Last Hearing27 Apr 2023
State--
City--
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • RANDHI SRIDHAR PRABHU
Respondent
  • PATTANSHETTI RAVI SUBHASH I A S
  • Sri A Chinni Krishna
  • Sri Y Srinivasa Rao

Case Summary

RANDHI SRIDHAR PRABHU filed Case No. CC 1584/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 3 Mar 2023 against PATTANSHETTI RAVI SUBHASH I A S and Sri A Chinni Krishna. The case has had one hearing so far. The case is currently pending. 3 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (1)

  • 27APR 2023
    Next Hearing

    Judge: N/A

Orders (3)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATHI HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE No.1584 OF 2023 Between: Randhi Sridhar Prabhu … Petitioner and Sri Pattanshetti Ravi Subhash, District Collector, Anakapalli District and others … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.M.Siva Kumar Counsel for the respondents: Mr.G.L.Narasimha Reddy ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Also heard the learned counsel for the respondents.

2.

The contempt case is filed alleging willful and deliberate violation of the orders dated 26.12.2022 passed in Writ Petition No.41526 of 2022, wherein the 3rd respondent herein is directed to pass orders afresh without reference to the earlier rejection proceedings, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order and after giving due opportunity to the petitioner and the other interested parties.

2 3.

At the time of considering the matter, learned counsel appearing for respondents submits that in due compliance of the orders dated 26.12.2022 passed by this Court, notices were issued to the petitioners and other interested parties and thereafter enquiry was conducted.

He submits that the 3rd respondent, on the basis of the enquiry, issued endorsement dated 01.3.2023 and therefore, there is no willful disobedience of the orders dated 26.12.2022.

4.

Considering the submissions made and perusing the material on record, this Court is of the considered view that no case is made out for invoking the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act against the respondents.

5.

In such view of the matter, the Contempt Case is closed.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J April 27, 2023. vasu