Meta Pixel
CNR: HPHC010374892020
DISPOSED

SUKH DEV vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

Case NumberEX.PT/78/2021
Date of Filing7 Nov 2020
Case TypeEX.PT
Last Hearing13 Aug 2021
State--
City--
Year of Filing2021

Party Details

Petitioner
  • SUKH DEV
Respondent
  • STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

Case Summary

SUKH DEV filed Case No. EX.PT/78/2021 in the Himachal Pradesh High Court on 7 Nov 2020 against STATE OF HP AND OTHERS. The case has undergone 2 hearings over 1 month. The case was disposed of on 13 Aug 2021. 4 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (2)

  • 13AUG 2021
    Disposed

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA

  • 8JUL 2021
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA

Orders (4)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

High Court of H.P.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA ON THE 13th DAY OF AUGUST, 2021 BEFORE HON’BLE MR.

JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA EXECUTION PETITION NO.

78 OF 2021 Between:- SUKH DEV SON OF SHRI RAM NATH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST OFFICE SUNEHRA, TEHSIL AND DISTT.

UNA, HIMACHAL PRADESH EX.

PUMP OPERATOR, I&PH DIVISION UNA, DISTT.

UNA, H.P. ….PETITIONER (BY SH.

A.K.

GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND 1.

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (I&PH) WITH HEADQUARTERS AT SHIMLA, H.P.

2.

THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, I&PH, U.S.

CLUB, SHIMLA, H.P.

3.

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, I&PH, DIVISION UNA, DISTT.

UNA, H.P.

4.

THE SENIOR DEPUTY ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, WITH HEADQUARTERS AT SHIMLA, H.P. ..RESPONDENTS (MR.

R.S.

DOGRA, SR.

ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL WITH MR.

HEMANSHU MISRA, ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR R-1 TO R-3 AND MR.

TARA CHAND CHAUHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R-4) ____________________________________ ::: Downloaded on - 10/06/2023 18:12:13 :::CIS High Court of H.P.

2 This petition coming on for orders this day, Hon’ble Mr.

Justice Satyen Vaidya, passed the following: O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the judgment has been complied with as the respondents have passed the consideration order.

She, however, seeks liberty to challenge the order so passed by the respondents and to withdraw the present petition.

Being so, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

August 13, 2021 ( Satyen Vaidya ) (naveen) Judge ::: Downloaded on - 10/06/2023 18:12:13 :::CIS