B JAYARAMUDU vs THE STATE OF AP

APHC010357972023 IN THE MONDAY,T TWO TH THE HONOURABLE DR WRIT P Between: 1.

B .Jayaramudu,, S/o.

Su 58, Sreenivasa Nagar, Ana 1.

The State of A P, Rep. b Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Gu 2.

The Superintendent of Po 3.

The Station House Office Petition under Article circumstances stated in th pleased topleased to issu particularly one in the natu 3rd respondent in summon attend the III Town Police petitioner's property to a Ananthapuram Town, (M Ananthapuram in ma HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER HOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT R JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PR PETITION NO: 18392 OF 2023 ubbarayudu, aged about 68 years, R/o. antapur, Anantapur District. ..

AND y its Prl.

Secretary, Home Department, S untur District, Andhra Pradesh olice, Anantapur, Anantapur District. er, III Town P.S., Anantapur, Anantapur D ...Re 226 of the Constitution of India praying e affidavit filed therewith, the High Co ue appropriate writ or order or dire re of writ of mandamus declaring the a ning the petitioner through the Head C e Station, Anantapur for illegal settlem an extent of Ac.0-30 cents in Sy.N Mahatma Gandhi Nagar, Revenue aking efforts to interfere in petitioner H RATAPA .D.No.13-3- ..Petitioner Secretariat, District. spondents g that in the urt may be ction more ction of the onstable to ment of the No.158/2 of e Colony), r's property knowingly it is a Civil dispute in nature is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Principles of Natural justice and in violation of Art.14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and contrary to police code and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent not to interfere or summon the petitioner to the III Town Police Station, Anantapur for illegal settlement of the petitioner's property to an extent of Ac.0-30 cents in Sy.No. in Sy.No.158/2 of Ananthapuram Town, (Mahatma Gandhi Nagar, Revenue Colony), Ananthapuram in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent not to interfere or summon the petitioner to the III Town Police Station, Anantapur for illegal settlement of the petitioner's property to an extent of Ac.0-30 cents in Sy.No.158/2 of Ananthapuram Town, (Mahatma Gandhi Nagar, Revenue Colony), Ananthapuram in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: N PREMRAJ Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18392 OF 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in summoning the petitioner through the Head Constable to attend the III Town Police Station, Anantapur for illegal settlement of the petitioner's property to an extent of Ac.0-30 cents in Sy.No.158/2 of Ananthapuram Town, (Mahatma Gandhi Nagar, Revenue Colony), Ananthapuram in making efforts to interfere in petitioner's property knowingly it is a Civil dispute in nature is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Principles of Natural justice and in violation of Art.14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and contrary to police code and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent not to interfere or summon the petitioner to the III Town Police Station, Anantapur for illegal settlement of the petitioner's property to an extent of Ac.0-30 cents in Sy.No.158/2 of Ananthapuram Town, (Mahatma Gandhi Nagar, Revenue Colony), Ananthapuram in the interest of justice and to pass…” 2.

Heard Sri N. ard Sri N.Premraj, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.

3.

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that, the police are not interfering in the civil dispute between the parties and never call the petitioner to the police station.

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.

5.

Considering the submissions made, the writ petition is disposed of.

However, respondent-police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ Dr.

JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.12.2025 KKV HON’BLE DR.

JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.18392 of 2023 Dated.08.12.2025 KKV 137 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: W.P.No.18392 of 2023 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl.

No.

Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 08.12.2025 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP,J KKV