M VENKATESWARLU vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Party Details
- M VENKATESWARLU
- M V N S Setty
- M V Vinod
- Malla Hari Babu
- Malla Bantu Babu
- Malla Koti Babu
- Raavi chiranjeevi
- Kattamuri Jagadeesh
- Kattamuri Nageswararao
- Kattamuru Satyavathi
- Kongala Venkata Ramana Murthy
- Gonnabattula Naga Raju
- Gonnabattula Kasi Ralnani
- SVR Murthy
- M Srinivasa Rao
- K Venkata Ganesh
- Y Simhachalam
- Mall Bhadrarao
- P Kondathalli
- G Ramu
- T Satyanand Guptha
- God Arjun
- Dhanaji Nivurutti Savanth
- Padamata Narasingarao
- Veginuka Appala Trinadha Rao
- SV Sampath Kumar Konagalla
- Konagalla Venkata Gayatri
- Konagalla Krishna
- Kolagani Raja Rao
- Yelamanchili Satyanarayana
- Kapuganti Sarveswararao
- Kosuri Ramu
- Jagarapu Nagamani
- Boddapu Appala Naidu
- Bennabatthula Manikyachari
- Bhale Bile Prahad
- Bennabattula Ratnachari
- Sunnam Nageswararao
- S V Satyanarayana
- THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
- The Commissioner
- Local Fund Choultry
- The Commissioner
Case Summary
M VENKATESWARLU and M V N S Setty filed Case No. WP 16396/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 5 Jul 2023 against THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH and The Commissioner. The case is currently pending. 8 orders have been issued in this matter.
Orders (8)
- 17JUN 2025judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 9
- 19MAR 2024orderView Order ↗
Order No: 8
- 5MAR 2024orderView Order ↗
Order No: 7
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
APHC010319382023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 16396/2023 Between: M Venkateswarlu and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.
D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.
GP FOR ENDOWMENTS 2.
M MANOHAR REDDY (SC FOR MUNC AND MUNC CORP ) 3.
JAGADISH KUAMAR BATCHU The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard Sri D.V.Sasidhar, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri G.
Naga Bhushanam, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments and Sri Chintapalli Srinivas, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No.3.
2 2.
The grievance of the petitioners is against the inaction of the respondents in considering the petitioners representation, dated 27.06.2023 for grant of lease of the subject land in their favour.
Though the representation is pending before the respondent No.2, since two years, no orders are passed on the said representation.
3.
The respondent No.2 has filed counter-affidavit stating that it is not feasible to give the subject land on lease in favour of the petitioners having regard to the fact that the subject land is required by the Choultry for construction of Kalyana Mandapam that was proposed by the Endowments Department.
4.
Having regard to the submissions made, since two years the representation has been pending for consideration before the respondent No.2.
This Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondent No.2 to dispose of the representation.
The respondent No.2 is accordingly directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of this order, after giving due opportunity to the petitioners.
5. ioners.
5.
With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
There shall be no order as to costs.
3 As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 17.06.2025 MSI 4 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 16396/2023 Date: 17.06.2025 MSI