SIMMA RAJU vs THE STATE OF AP
Party Details
- SIMMA RAJU
- Kalidindi Srinu Chakali Srinu
- THE STATE OF AP
Case Summary
SIMMA RAJU and Kalidindi Srinu Chakali Srinu filed Case No. CRLP 3722/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 6 Jun 2023 against THE STATE OF AP. The case has had one hearing so far. The case is currently pending. 1 order has been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (1)
- 15JUN 2023Next Hearing
Judge: N/A
Orders (1)
- 15JUN 2023judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 1
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.
SURESH REDDY Criminal Petition No.3722 of 2023 ORDER: A.1 &A.2 in Cr.No.115 of 2023 of Peddapuram Police Station, Kakinada District, filed the present application under Sections 437 & 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code of 1973, seeking to enlarge them on bail.
The above crime was registered against the petitioners for the offences under Sections 307 and 324 read with 34 of IPC.
2.
Case of the prosecution is that, on 22.04.2023 at about 5.30 p.m., both the petitioners went to the de-facto complainant and questioned him about making bad propaganda against them, for which he replied that he never made any such bad propaganda against the petitioners.
At that juncture, an altercation took place between the petitioners and the de-facto complainant.
Then both the accused inflicted injuries with broken beer bottles lying on the spot.
The de-facto complainant received seven injuries on his body.
According to the wound certificate issued by the Medical Officer, Community Health Centre, Peddapuram, out of seven injuries, first injury is bone deep cut injury over left wrist, second injury is muscle deep cut injury over left shoulder and the injuries 3 to 7 are concerned, they are skin deep injuries over upper back, lower back, neck and upper chest.
3.
Heard both sides and perused the record.
2 KSR, J Crl.P.No.3722 of 2023 4.
It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that all the injuries received by the de-facto complainant are either superficial or simple in nature and the doctor, though in his wound certificate has stated that the injuries are grievous in nature, but the description of the injuries would disclose that they are only simple in nature.
Further, it is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the de-facto complainant was discharged from the hospital on the same day.
It is also contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are in judicial custody from 24.04. rom 24.04.2023 and as such, the learned counsel for the petitioners requested to enlarge the petitioners on bail.
5.
On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application stating that the petitioners involved in some other crimes and rowdy sheets were also opened against them.
6.
Be that as it may, as seen from the material on record, the petitioners were in judicial custody from 24.04.2023 and the injuries received by the de-facto complainant are either superficial or simple in nature.
Further, the de-facto complainant was already discharged from the hospital.
In that view of the matter, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail with certain conditions.
7.
The petitioners/A.1 & A.2 are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the 3 KSR, J Crl.P.No.3722 of 2023 First Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Peddapuram.
On such release, the petitioners/A.1 & A.2 are directed to appear before the Station House Officer, Peddapuram Police Station, on every Sunday between 10.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m., until further orders.
8.
The criminal petition is, allowed, accordingly. _____________________ JUSTICE K.
SURESH REDDY Date: 15.06.2023 bss 4 KSR, J Crl.P.No.3722 of 2023 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.
SURESH REDDY Criminal Petition No.3722 of 2023 Date: 15.06.2023 BSS