Meta Pixel
CNR: --
DISPOSED

PALLA VENKATA RAMANA vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

Case NumberCRLP 3327/2023
Date of Filing1 May 2023
Case TypeCRLP
Last Hearing5 May 2023
State--
City--
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • PALLA VENKATA RAMANA
Respondent
  • THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
  • Avula Koteswarao Rao

Case Summary

PALLA VENKATA RAMANA filed Case No. CRLP 3327/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 1 May 2023 against THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH and Avula Koteswarao Rao. The case has had one hearing so far. The case was disposed of on 5 May 2023. 1 order has been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (1)

  • 5MAY 2023
    Next Hearing

    Judge: N/A

Orders (1)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

BSB, J Crl.P.

No.3327 of 2023 THE HON’BLE Ms.

JUSTICE B.S.BHANUMATHI Criminal Petition No.3327 of 2023 O R D E R: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the order dated 28.10.2022 in Crl.MP.No.6106 of 2022 in C.C.

No.600 of 2020 on the file of the Hon’ble VII Special Magistrate, Visakhapatnam.

2.

The petitioner herein is the accused in C.C.

No.600 of 2020 and filed petition under Section 311 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to recall P.W.1 for further cross examination stating that he suffered from COVID-19 from 01.06.2022 to 17.07.2022, but meanwhile, P.W.1 was examined in cross on 15.06.2022 by his counsel basing on meagre and insufficient brief as adjournment was declined, but very crucial information is to be elicited regarding some documents.

Counter was filed by the complainant opposing the petition stating that the document filed along with the petition does not show that the petitioner was effected by Covid-19 as on the date of the cross examination and the petition was filed on vague reasons and to drag on the proceedings and further that the petitioner feared many other creditors who gave him lakhs of rupees and the petitioner left Visakhapatnam.

The petition was dismissed holing that P.W.1 was already cross examined at length which runs about 3½ pages for a simple petition complaining bouncing of a cheque BSB, J Crl.P.

No.3327 of 2023 2 and all related aspects were covered and now it amounts to filing up lacunas if the petition is allowed and causes prejudice to the other side and further that there is no reasonable ground to recall P.W.1.

No observation is made about the enclosed document.

3.

The contention of the petitioner is that one more opportunity may be given to the petitioner/accused to recall the P.W.

1 for further cross examination. amination.

The petitioner enclosed the copy of case status showing day to day proceedings in a case which reads as follows: Registration Number JUDGE Business on Date Hearing Date Purpose of hearing 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 27-01-2021 12-03-2021 Summons 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 12-03-2021 03-05-2021 Issue bw/nbw 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 03-05-2021 14-06-2021 Issue bw/nbw 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 14-06-2021 27-07-2021 Issue bw/nbw 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 27-07-2021 16-09-2021 Await reports 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 16-09-2021 16-11-2021 Await reports 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 16-11-2021 03-01-2022 Await reports 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 03-01-2022 16-02-2022 Await reports 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 16-02-2022 17-02-2022 Await reports 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 17-02-2022 25-02-2022 Examination 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 25-02-2022 28-03-2022 Examination 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 28-03-2022 07-04-2022 Examination BSB, J Crl.P.

No.3327 of 2023 3 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 07-04-2022 20-04-2022 Examination 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 20-04-2022 04-05-2022 For trial 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 04-05-2022 11-05-2022 Evidence 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 11-05-2022 02-06-2022 Cross examination of pet 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 02-06-2022 15-06-2022 Cross examination of pet 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 15-06-2022 23-06-2022 Further evidence 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 23-06-2022 30-06-2022 Further evidence 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 30-06-2022 11-07-2022 Cross examination of pet 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 11-07-2022 18-07-2022 Further evidence 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 18-07-2022 28-07-2022 313 crpc examination 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 28-07-2022 11-08-2022 313 crpc examination 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 11-08-2022 23-08-2022 Defence evidence 600/2020 e 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 23-08-2022 30-08-2022 Defence evidence 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 30-08-2022 06-09-2022 Call on 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 06-09-2022 13-09-2022 Further evidence 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 13-09-2022 20-09-2022 Further evidence 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 20-09-2022 27-09-2022 Defence evidence 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 27-09-2022 12-10-2022 Defence evidence 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 12-10-2022 19-10-2022 Defence evidence 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 19-10-2022 21-10-2022 For arguments 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 21-10-2022 28-10-2022 Call with mps BSB, J Crl.P.

No.3327 of 2023 4 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 28-10-2022 15-11-2022 For arguments 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 15-11-2022 28-11-2022 For arguments 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 28-11-2022 29-11-2022 Call with mps 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 29-11-2022 06-12-2022 Call with mps 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 06-12-2022 13-12-2022 Call with mps 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 13-12-2022 15-12-2022 Call with mps 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 15-12-2022 22-12-2022 Call with mps 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 22-12-2022 26-12-2022 Call with mps 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 26-12-2022 02-01-2023 Cross examination of res 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 02-01-2023 11-01-2023 For arguments 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 11-01-2023 12-01-2023 Judgment 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 12-01-2023 30-01-2023 Judgment 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 30-01-2023 02-02-2023 Call with mps 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 02-02-2023 07-02-2023 Call with mps 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 07-02-2023 15-02-2023 Call with mps 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 15-02-2023 20-02-2023 Call with mps 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 20-02-2023 27-02-2023 Call with mps 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 27-02-2023 28-02-2023 Call with mps 600/2020 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 28-02-2023 06-03-2023 Call with mps 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 06-03-2023 13-03-2023 Call with mps 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 13-03-2023 20-03-2023 Call with mps BSB, J Crl.P.

No.3327 of 2023 5 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 20-03-2023 27-03-2023 Call with mps 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 27-03-2023 28-03-2023 Call with mps 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 28-03-2023 29-03-2023 Defence evidence 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 29-03-2023 06-04-2023 Cross examination of res 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 06-04-2023 13-04-2023 Cross examination of res 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 13-04-2023 20-04-2023 Further evidence 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 20-04-2023 21-04-2023 For arguments 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 21-04-2023 28-04-2023 Cross examination of res 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 28-04-2023 03-05-2023 Cross examination of res 600/2020 SPL MAGISTRATE COURT - VII 03-05-2023 12-05-2023 Cross examination of res 3.

The above details show how much opportunity has been given to the petitioner, yet having failed to take an opportunity at the earliest point of time after closing cross examination of P.W.1, the petitioner has filed this application at the fag end of the proceedings and the learned Magistrate has given valid reasons for dismissing the petition because the contention is that P.W.1 was cross examined basing on meagre and insufficient brief given by the petitioner.

The copy of the document filed with the petition was not filed here.

No deficiency in the evidence in cross examination of P.W.1 already recorded is shown, nor any other ground to interfere with the impugned order under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure is made out.

Filing of this petition BSB, J Crl.P.

No.3327 of 2023 6 is just a sheer abuse of process of law.

Hence, the present Criminal Petition is dismissed.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. nd closed. _____________________ B.S.BHANUMATHI, J Dt.05.05.2023 TJN