KUNAPU NARSINGA RAO vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

APHC010223502023 IN TH MONDA TWO THE HONOURA WR Between: 1.

KUNAPU NARSING YEARS, R/O, R ETCHERLA MANDA 1.

THE STATE OF A SECRETARY, PA DEPARTMENT, AMARAVATI, GUNT 2.

THE STATE OF SECRETARY, FINA VELAGAPUDI, AMA 3.

THE COMMISSIO DEVELOPMENT, T 4.

THE DISTRICT CO UNDER MGNREG S 5.

THE PROJECT DI ORDINATOR SRIK 6.

THE MANDAL P ETCHELA MANDAL 7.

THE RAGHUNADH E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) AY,THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL RIT PETITION NO: 11711/2023 GA RAO, S/O KOTESWARA RAO, AG RAGHUNADHAPURAM,ALLINAGARA AL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

AND ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.

BY IT ANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL D SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, TUR DISTRICT.

ANDRA PRADESH, REP.

BY IT' ANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIA ARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

ONER OF PANCHAYAT RAJ HE STATE OF ANDRA PRADESH, A OLLECTOR CUM PROGRAMMA CO SCHEME, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

RECTOR, DWMA AND JOINT PRO KAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFF L, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

HAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, DESH [3332] LAPATI GED ABOUT 37 AM VILLAGE, ...PETITIONER 'S PRINCIPAL EVELOPMENT VELAGAPUDI, 'S PRINCIPAL AT BUILDINGS, AND RURAL AMARAVATI.

O ORDINATOR OGRAMME CO ICER MPDO, REP.

BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, ALLINAGARAM, ETCHERLA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature in WRIT of MANDAMUS aggrieved by the action of the Respondents in in not releasing the pending bills of Rs 2,46,118/- with respect works done at Allinagaram village, Etcherla Mandal, Srikakulam District under MGNREG Scheme in connection with work ID Nos. (1).

95596 (2).

95839is without any authority and the same is highly illegal, unjust, arbitrary and contrary to law and violations of Principles of Natural Justice and contrary Articles 300-A, 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith release and pay the above pending bills of Rs 2,46,118/- and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents to immediately release the pending bills of Rs 2,46,118/- with respect works done at Allinagaram village, Etcherla Mandal, Srikakulam District under MGNREG Scheme in connection with work ID Nos. (1).

95596, (2).95839 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.S SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: ORDER Sri J.S.Venkatesh, learned counsel, representing Sri S.

Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in this writ petition has become infructuous and hence dismiss the writ petition.

2.

In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Dated: 1st December, 2025.

RR