DANDUPATI RAMU vs SECRETARY
Party Details
- DANDUPATI RAMU
- SECRETARY
- Union of India
- Divisional Railway Manager
Case Summary
DANDUPATI RAMU filed Case No. WP 10668/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 25 Apr 2023 against SECRETARY and Union of India. The case has had one hearing so far. The next hearing is scheduled for 1 Jan 5000. 2 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (1)
- 1JAN 5000Next Hearing
Judge: N/A
Orders (2)
- 1APR 2024judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 3
- 26APR 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: 1
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
APHC010205502023 IN THE H (S MONDA TWO THO THE HONOURABLE SR WRIT P Between: 1.
DANDUPATI RAMU RESIDENT OF DO TEMPLE, KANCHAR 1.
SECRETARY, MINI INDIA , NEW DELHI 2.
UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BHUBANESHWAR 3.
DIVISIONAL RAILW COAST RAILWAY , D Petition under Artic that in the circumstanc High Court may be pleas more so in the nature of to provide a job to peti compassionate employm son of the petitioner and HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADES AT AMARAVATI Special Original Jurisdiction) AY ,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL OUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT RI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAK PRASAD PETITION NO: 10668/2023 U, S/O D APPANNA HINDU, A OOR NO 36-25-3/2, NEAR MUTY RAPALEM METTU VISAKHAPATNAM ...PET AND ISTRY OF RAILWAYS GOVERNM I EAST COAST RAILWAY, CHAKRAD BY ITS GENERAL MANA WAY MANAGER, , WALTAIR DIVISIO DONDAPARTHY , VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPON cle 226 of the Constitution of Indi ces stated in the affidavit filed ther sed to order by way of writ, order or f writ of Mandamus directing the re tioner's son by name Kurma Rao ment in the railways in the quota of d set aside the order dated 29-07-20 SH [3328] KRISHNA GE 60 , YAMAMBA -08 TITIONER MENT OF DHARPUR GER , ON, EAST .
NDENT(S): ia praying rewith, the r direction spondents by way of f deceased 020 issued by the railways and consider the representation dated 10-09-2020 of the petitioner in the interests of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to consider the representation dated 10-09-2020 sent by petitioner to the railways and provide job to son of the petitioner on compassionate grounds by name Kurma Rao in the interests of justice and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KUPPILI MURALIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.Y V ANIL KUMAR (Central Government Counsel) 2.Y V ANIL KUMAR (Central Government Counsel) 3. ounsel) 3.Y V ANIL KUMAR (Central Government Counsel) The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri P.
Nooka Raju, Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Kuppili Muralidhar, Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri Bhanu Sai Prasad Varma, Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Y.V.
Anil Kumar, Learned Central Government Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
2.
Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner has submitted a Letter dated 28.03.2024 to the Registry accompanied by the Letter of the Writ Petitioner dated 28.03.2024, seeking withdraw this Writ Petition.
Both the Letters are taken on record.
3.
Request granted.
4.
Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
No order as to costs.
5.
Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. __________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt.
01.04.2024, Vns