VADLAMUDI RAMA KRISHNAIAH vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Party Details
- VADLAMUDI RAMA KRISHNAIAH
- THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
- The State of Andhra Pradesh
- The Commissioner Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department
- The District Collector Panchayat Wing
- The Mandal Parishad Development Officer
- The Executive Engineer
- The Project Director
- The Thikkavarappadu Gram Panchayat
Case Summary
VADLAMUDI RAMA KRISHNAIAH filed Case No. WP 10795/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 26 Apr 2023 against THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH and The State of Andhra Pradesh. The case has had one hearing so far. The case is currently pending. 1 order has been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (1)
- 15JUN 2023Next Hearing
Judge: N/A
Orders (1)
- 1DEC 2025judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 1
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
APHC010207972023 IN TH MONDA TWO THE HONOURA WR Between: 1.
VADLAMUDI RAM YEARS, R/ O.
KU MANDAL, SPSR NE 1.
THE STATE OF A SECRETARY TO G DEVELOPMENT AMARAVATI, GUNT 2.
THE STATE OF A SECRETARY TO SECRETARIAT, VE 3.
THE COMMISSI DEVELOPMENT DE 4.
THE DISTRICT CO DISTRICT AT NELL 5.
THE MANDAL VENKATACHALAM DISTRICT.
6.
THE EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT NEL E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) AY,THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL RIT PETITION NO: 10795/2023 MA KRISHNAIAH, S/O.
SUBBAYY URICHERLAPADU VILLAGE VEN ELLORE DISTRICT.
AND ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.
BY ITS GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT TUR DISTRICT.
ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.
BY ITS O GOVERNMENT, FINANCE D ELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR ONER PANCHAYAT RAJ A EPARTMENT, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR OLLECTOR PANCHAYAT WING, SP LORE.
PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT M MANDAL, VENKATACHALAM SP E ENGINEER, RURAL WATE LLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
DESH [3332] LAPATI YA AGED 48 KATACHALAM ...PETITIONER S PRINCIPAL AND RURAL VELAGAPUDI, S PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT DISTRICT.
AND RURAL R DISTRICT PSR NELLORE OFFICER, PSR NELLORE ER SUPPLY 7.
THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DWMA), SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT AT NELLORE 8.
THE THIKKAVARAPPADU GRAM PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
THIKKAVARAPPADU VILLAGE, VENKATACHALAM MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents in not paying bill amounts towards the cost of material supplied and skilled 85 semi-skilled labour engaged by the petitioner for execution of 1) Work Code No.
0209030009/RC/7707010080035 for an amount of Rs.
6,60,782/- and ii) Work Code No. k Code No.
0209030009/RC/7707010080036 for an amount of Rs.
5,88,483/- 85 Rs.
64,542/- as illegal, arbitrary, irresponsible, against to the principles of natural justice apart from being violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents to pay the above amounts forthwith along with interest in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to pay the bill amounts towards the cost of material supplied and skilled and semi-skilled labour engaged by the petitioner for execution of i) Work Code No.
6,60,782/- and ii) Work Code No.
5,88,483/- and Rs.
64,542/-, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.VENKATA REDDY GAJJALA SC FOR ZPP, MPP, AND GRAM PANCHAYAT 2.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 3.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: ORDER Ms.Ch.S.N.Meena Kumari, learned counsel, representing Sri Kambhampati Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the petitioner had received the amount claimed by him in this writ petition and hence this writ petition can be closed.
2.
In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is closed.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Dated: 1st December, 2025.