Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

SIYYADULA SURYANARAYANA vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

Case NumberWP 10283/2023
Date of Filing21 Apr 2023
Case TypeWP
Last Hearing25 Apr 2023
State--
City--
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • SIYYADULA SURYANARAYANA
Respondent
  • THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
  • The Director General of Police
  • The Superintendent of police
  • The Deputy Superintendent of police
  • The Station House Officer
  • The District Collector
  • The Revenue Divisional Officer
  • The Tahsildar

Case Summary

SIYYADULA SURYANARAYANA filed Case No. WP 10283/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 21 Apr 2023 against THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH and The Director General of Police. The case has had one hearing so far. The case is currently pending. 2 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (1)

  • 25APR 2023
    Next Hearing

    Judge: N/A

Orders (2)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10283 of 2023 ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief; “….to issue a Writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents in (i) not conducting investigation and not filing final report in FIR No 141/2022 of Jami police station, Vizianagaram District (ii) not including the relevant provision of offence under The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,1989 (iii) not paying relevant compensation to the petitioner as per Annexure-I under Rule 12(4) of Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules 1995 as illegal, highhanded, arbitrary against Law, unjust and principles of natural justice and consequently (i) direct the respondents to conclude the investigation and file final report in FIR No 141/2022 of Jami Police station, Vizianagaram District forthwith (ii) disburse compensation to the petitioner as per Annexure-I under Rule 12(4) of Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities Rules) 1995 and pass…” 2.

Heard both sides and perused the record.

3.

Grievance of the petitioner is that though the case has been registered in the year 2022, the police have not filed any charge sheet to that extent.

4.

A counter affidavit, deposed by 5th respondent, is filed, stating inter alia that no prima facie case is established so 2 far against suspected person and the investigation in the said case is continuing to identify whether it is a case of litting fire to the hut or it was caused accidentally.

It is further stated that the respondent/police have conducted investigation in fair and proper way and that the respondent/police will take action in accordance with law. with law.

It is also stated that in any case, if prima facie case is proved as against any of them, they will also take steps to alter the Section of law under the provisions of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities Act), 1989 and finalize the investigation as early as possible as there are no clues with regard to arson.

5.

In view of the averments made in the counter filed by 5th respondent, this Court is satisfied with the investigation done by the police and placing the said averments on record, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

No costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Writ Petition, shall stand closed. _____________________________________ JUSTICE K.

SREENIVASA REDDY Dated: 20.6.2023 GR 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10283 of 2023 Date:20.6.2023 GR