P BHAGYAMMA vs THE STATE OF AP

APHC010189212023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 9742 of 2023 Between: 1.

P BHAGYAMMA, W/O P.

VENKATARAMANA.

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC.

AGRICULTURE.

R/O DANDUPALEM VILLAGE, RAGANIPALLI PANCHAV AT.

PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1.

THE STATE OF AP, REP.

BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, AP SECRETARIAT.

VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2.

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

3.

THE TAHSILDAR, , PUNGANUR MANDAL.

CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

4.

P RAVI KUMAR, S/O NAGULAPPA NAIDU.

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC.

BUSINESS.

R/O DANDUPALEM VILLAGE, RAGANIPALLI PANCHAYAT, PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tobe pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the Petitioner prays that more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, the declaring the action of the respondent's No.3 with collusion of the respondent No4 in interfering with the petitioner peaceful possession and enjoyment of the house hold occupancy over the house site an extent of Ac0-04 cents in Sy.No.88/13.

2 bearing VHS No.3593/1406. dated 30.03.2007 situated at Dandupalem village, Raganipalli Panchayat, Punganur Mandal, Chittoor District and threatening to dispossess petitioner house as illegal, arbitrary. violation of Principal of Natural Justice and violation of Article 14.

21 and 300 A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.3 and 4 not to interfere with petitioner respect of house site an extent of Ac 0-04 cents in Sv .no.88/13. bearing VHS No.3593/1406. dated 30.03.2006 situated at Dandupalem village. m village.

Raganipalli Panchayat, Punganur Mandal.

Chittoor District peaceful possession and enjoyment over the house site and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased please to direct the respondents not to dispossess of the petitioner from her peaceful possession and enjoyment of house site an extent of Ac 0¬04 cents in Sy.No.88/13 of Dandupalem village, Raganipalli Panchayat, Punganur Mandal, Chittoor District, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass such IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 20-04-2023 passed in WP.No.9742 of 2023, and also dismiss the writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to vacate the interim orders granted by this Hon'ble Court on 20/04/2023, inW.P.

No.9742 of 2023, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.

K N MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.

GP FOR REVENUE 2.

P S P SURESH KUMAR The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.9742 of 2023 ORDER:- Despite the writ petition being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

Hence, it indicates that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date:03.12.2025 KNN 4 91 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.

TITION No.9742 of 2023 Date: 03.12.2025 KNN