Meta Pixel
CNR: --
DISPOSED

M BALAJI GANGHADHAR TILAK vs The State of Andhra Pradesh,

Case NumberWP 9332/2023
Date of Filing12 Apr 2023
Case TypeWP
Last Hearing18 Apr 2023
State--
City--
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • M BALAJI GANGHADHAR TILAK
Respondent
  • The State of Andhra Pradesh
  • The Superintendent of Police
  • The Station House Officer
  • Sri Tambaiah
  • Smt Rasaputra Subhadra Bai
  • Sri IqBal Basha
  • Sri Lakshmi Narayana
  • Smt Sudha Madhavi
  • Smt K Nagalakshmi
  • Sri Srinivasa Reddy

Case Summary

M BALAJI GANGHADHAR TILAK filed Case No. WP 9332/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 12 Apr 2023 against The State of Andhra Pradesh and The Superintendent of Police. The case has had one hearing so far. The case was disposed of on 18 Apr 2023. 1 order has been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (1)

  • 18APR 2023
    Next Hearing

    Judge: N/A

Orders (1)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

7 THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE B.S.BHANUMATHI Writ Petition No.9332 of 2023 ORDER : The Writ Petition is filed seeking the following prayer: “… to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the official respondents/police instead of registering the FIR basing on the petitioner’s representation dated 11.3.2023, threatening the petitioner with dire consequences in collusion with the unofficial respondents, further the police also interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the subject property to an extent of Ac.1.06 cents in Survey No.781J, situated at Kallur village and Mandal, Kurnool and threatening the petitioner not to lay the compound wall in the subject property, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the subject property and further direct the official respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 11.3.2023…” 2.

Heard both sides.

3.

Learned Government Pleader for Home submitted that case in Crime No.75 of 2023 of III Town Kurnool Police Station registered on 11.03.2023, basing on the complaint of Smt.B.Sunitha Rani under Sections 447, 427, 506, 509 r/w 34 2 W.P.No.9332 of 2023 IPC.

But the police are not interfering with the issue of the petitioner.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has a permanent injunction in his favour in O.S.No.51 of 2019 on the file of the Court of IV Additional District Judge, Kurnool, however, the police are illegally interfering with the possession.

5.

The grievance of the petitioner is that he is not allowed to raise compound wall around the disputed property.

Whereas, the police registered the case basing on the complaint.

As the police are entitled to investigate against the cognizable offences, it cannot be termed as interference. erference.

So far as the decree of permanent injunction in favour of the petitioner is concerned, the police have no authority to support any member against whom the decree exists.

However, they are entitled to investigate the crime registered for the cognizable offence(s).

6.

With these observations, the Writ Petition is closed.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE B.S.BHANUMATHI Date : 18-04-2023 SAB