Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

ADAPA VENKATA RAO vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

Case NumberWP 9695/2023
Date of Filing18 Apr 2023
Case TypeWP
Last Hearing19 Apr 2023
State--
City--
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • ADAPA VENKATA RAO
Respondent
  • THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
  • The Engineer in Chief
  • The Superintending Engineer
  • The Chief Executive Officer
  • The Executive Engineer

Case Summary

ADAPA VENKATA RAO filed Case No. WP 9695/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 18 Apr 2023 against THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH and The Engineer in Chief. The case has had one hearing so far. The case is currently pending. 5 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (1)

  • 19APR 2023
    Next Hearing

    Judge: N/A

Orders (5)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MAIN CASE No.

W.

P.

No.

9695 of 2023 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl.

DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 19.04.2023 DR, J The present Writ Petition is filed assailing the action of the respondents in disqualifying the petitioner in the technical bid in Tender ID No.600602 for the work “Operation and Maintenance of CPWS Scheme to 28 Scarcity Habitations in Gudluru and Lingasamudram Mandals of SPS Nellore District (earlier Prakasam District) for the year 2023-24” with an estimated Contract value of Rs.70,30,141/- under the pretext of blacklisting without any notice to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary.

Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner pointed out that the respondents rejected the technical bid of the petitioner by invoking 17(1) of the Tender notification, which is nothing but unilateral cancellation of the bid, since no reasons were mentioned.

He further submitted that in fact, as per Clause 12(3) of the notification, the petitioner uploaded the past performance Contract; despite the same, the respondents invoked the clause 17(1).

2 Learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents, on instructions, submitted that as per the instructions submitted by the respondents, past performance of the petitioner was recorded as poor performance.

In fact, the petitioner has left the work without completing, as per the earlier notification, in view of the poor performance the respondents have invoked 17(1) and rejected the bid of the petitioner.

The agreements were entered with L1 on 15.04.2023 itself.

Considering the above submissions, more specifically as contended by the leaned senior counsel that when the petitioners have uploaded the Past Performance Certificate, without there being any notice with regard to the poor performance of the earlier tender, the respondents cannot invoke the 17(1), which required to be dealt with by this court only after filing of the counter and the record. he record.

Hence, if any award made, pursuant to the tender notification, shall be subject to the result of the Writ Petition.

The respondents are directed to file their counters along with relevant record.

Post after four (04) weeks. _________ DR, J Pnr 3