M SIVA REDDY vs SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR,I.A.S.,
Party Details
- M SIVA REDDY
- SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR I A S
- Sri Shamsheer Singh Rawat I A S
- Sri V Thirumaleshwara Reddy
- Sri Shaik Jeelani Basha
Case Summary
M SIVA REDDY filed Case No. CC 1519/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 4 Mar 2023 against SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR I A S and Sri Shamsheer Singh Rawat I A S. The case is currently pending. 3 orders have been issued in this matter.
Orders (3)
- 29FEB 2024judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 4
- 16NOV 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: 3
- 11AUG 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: 1
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
APHC010110082023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR [ 3206 ] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1519 OF 2023 Between: 1.
M SIVA REDDY, S/o.
Rajeswara Reddy, aged 37 years, R/o.
H.No.
45- 142-A33, Road No.
2, Ramalingeswara Nagar, Venkata Ramana Colony, Kurnool, Kurnool District. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.
SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR I A S, Represented by its Secretary, Irrigation Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
2.
Sri Shamsheer Singh Rawat I A S, Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
3.
Sri V Thirumaleshwara Reddy, Executive Engineer, KC Canal Division, Nandyal, Kurnool District.
4.
Sri Shaik Jeelani Basha, Deputy Executive Engineer, KC Canal Sub Division, Kurnool, Kurnool District. ...CONTEMNORS Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein for their wilful violation and deliberate disobedience to the orders dated 08.08.2022 passed in W.P.No.20557 of 2022 by this Hon'ble Court of His Lordships' Hon'ble Sri Justice R.Raghunandan Rao, under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI.
GINJUPALLI SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: S SIVA KUMARI The Court made the following: Order: Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the bills of the petitioner have been cleared.
Learned counsel for the petitioner sought time for verification.
However, no instructions appeared to have been received.
In the circumstances, this contempt case is closed with liberty to the petitioner to revive this petition, if the orders of this Court have not been complied with.
There shall be no order as to costs. to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ R RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J Js.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.
RAGHUNANDAN RAO C.C.No.1519 of 2023 29th February, 2024 Js.