Meta Pixel
CNR: --
DISPOSED

BOLLI APPA RAO vs THE STATE OF AP

Case NumberWP 7118/2023
Date of Filing21 Mar 2023
Case TypeWP
Last Hearing23 Mar 2023
State--
City--
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • BOLLI APPA RAO
Respondent
  • THE STATE OF AP
  • The District Collector
  • The Tahsildar

Case Summary

BOLLI APPA RAO filed Case No. WP 7118/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 21 Mar 2023 against THE STATE OF AP and The District Collector. The case has had one hearing so far. The case was disposed of on 23 Mar 2023. 1 order has been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (1)

  • 23MAR 2023
    Next Hearing

    Judge: N/A

Orders (1)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION No.7118 of 2023 Bolli Appa Rao, S/o.

Late Rama Swamy, Aged about 58 years, R/o.

Flat No.

4a- 5th floor, Sri Narayana Lakshmi Nilayam, Ramnagar, Visakhapatnam. ….

Petitioner Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.

By its Principle Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi and 2 others. ….Respondents ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents.

2.

The grievance of the writ petitioner is that the petitioner’s representation dated 05.12.2022 for mutation of his name in the revenue records for issuance of Patatadar Passbooks in respect of the land in an extent of Ac.

3.26 cents in Sy.Nos.

1, 7, 8, 9, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31, 72, 73, 74 situated at Gujjanagivalasa village, Gurla Mandal, Vizianagaram District is rejected without considering the material available on record.

2 3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner succeeded the suit in O.S.No.

4/1983 on the file of the Subordinate Judge Court, Vizianagaram dated 29.09.1988.

Aggrieved by the same, the 1st defendant therein preferred an appeal in A.S.No.

48 of 1991 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Vizianagaram and the same was dismissed on merits vide judgment dated 22.02.1994.

Consequently, the petitioner submitted a representation to the 3rd respondent dated 05.12.2022 seeking mutation of his name in the revenue records for the subject land.

But the same was rejected without considering the material available on record.

Hence, the writ petition.

4.

On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner has to make an online application to the 3rd respondent and if so, the same would be considered by following the due procedure.

5. cedure.

5.

In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the petitioner is permitted to make an online application for the above said relief to the 3rd respondent through the Village Secretariat concerned, for mutation of his name in the revenue records for the subject land by enclosing the necessary documents in support of his claim within a period 3 of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

On receipt of the same, the 3rd respondent shall consider and dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible strictly in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months thereafter, by considering all the material available on record for the subject property.

After hearing all the parties concerned including the petitioner herein, appropriate orders shall be passed on it’s own merits.

6.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 23.03.2023 PGT/KLK