CHEJERLA LAKSHMI DEVI vs THE STATE OF AP
Party Details
- CHEJERLA LAKSHMI DEVI
- THE STATE OF AP
- The District Collector
- The Revenue Divisional Officer
- The Tahsildar
- The Mandal Surveyor
- The Revenue Inspector
- The Village Revenue Officer
- The Station HouSe Officer
Case Summary
CHEJERLA LAKSHMI DEVI filed Case No. WP 824/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 6 Jan 2023 against THE STATE OF AP and The District Collector. The case has had one hearing so far. The next hearing is scheduled for 1 Jan 5000. 6 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (1)
- 1JAN 5000Next Hearing
Judge: N/A
Orders (6)
- 25FEB 2026judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 6
- 4FEB 2026orderView Order ↗
Order No: 5
- 22DEC 2025orderView Order ↗
Order No: 4
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
APHC010014932023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 824/2023 Between: 1.
CHEJERLA LAKSHMI DEVI, W/O CHEJARLA SRINIVASULU, AGED 36 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O.
BATA GARAMAM, YENEPALLI HARIJANAWADA TN PETA POST, NAGINENIGUNTA PANCHAYATH,MARRIPADU MANDAL, UDAYAGIRI, S.P.S.R.
NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.
THE STATE OF AP, REP.
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2.
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, S.P.S.R.
NELLORE DISTRICT AT NELLORE.
3.
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ATMAKUR (KAVALI) REVENUE DIVISION, ATMAKUR, S.P.S.R.
NELLORE DISTRICT.
4.
THE TAHSILDAR, MARRIPADU MANDAL, S.P.S.R.
5.
THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, MARRIPADU MANDAL, S.P.S.R.
6.
THE REVENUE INSPECTOR, MARRIPADU MANDAL, S.P.S.R.NELLORE DISTRICT.
2 7.
THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, BATA GARAMAM, MARRIPADU MANDAL, S.P.S.R.NELLORE DISTRICT.
8.
THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MARRIPADU POLICE STATION, MARRIPADU MANDAL, S.P.S.R.NELLORE ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess and demarcate my landed schedule property and insisting me to vacate from my landed property in an extent of Ac.2.00 Cents in Sy.No.
309-4 which is bounded by East.
Chejerla Venkataiah, S/o Ramanaiah Sy.No.309 (High tension Pole), West.
Chejarla Ramanaiah, S/o Rosaiah, Sy.No.310, North. (Kunta), Nallipogu Rosaiah, S/o Seshaiah, Sy.No.308, South.
Vaddipalli Pencalaiah, S/o Chinna Penchalaiah Varapu Karraiah of Naginenigunta Revenue Village, Marripadu Mandal of S. ndal of S.P.S.R.
Nellore District without following any known procedure established by law, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess my landed property and not to demarcate my landed property and not to interfere in any manner with my peaceful possession and enjoyment over my said landed schedule properties and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess, interfere and not to demarcate with my peaceful possession and enjoyment over my landed schedule property in an extent of Ac.2.00 Cents in Sy.No.
Vaddipalli Pencalalah, S/o Chinna Penchalaiah Varapu Karraiah of Naginenigunta Revenue Village, Marripadu Mandal of S.P.S.R.
Nellore District, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to grant leave to the 4th Respondent in the Wirt Petition 824 of 2023 to file counter affidavit in the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.
DHANUNJAYA BARU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.
GP FOR HOME 2.
GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.824 OF 2023 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declarin S declaring the action of the respondents in trying to demarcate my landed schedule property and insisting me to vacate from my landed property in an extent of Ac.2.00 Cents in Sy.No.309-4 which is bounded by East: Chejerla Venkataiah, S/o Ramanaiah Sy.No.309 (High tension Pole), West: Chejarla Ramanaiah, S/o Rosaiah, Sy.No.310, North: (Kunta), Nallipogu Rosaiah, S/o Seshaiah, Sy.No.308, South: Vaddipalli Pencalaiah, S/o Chinna Penchalaiah @ Varapu Karraiah of Naginenigunta Revenue Village, Marripadu Mandal of S.P.S.R.
Nellore District, without following any known procedure established by law, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess my landed property and not to demarcate my landed property and not to interfere in any manner with my peaceful possession and enjoyment over my said landed schedule properties and pass such other order or orders…” 2.
Heard Sri Dhanunjaya Baru, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader for respondents.
The writ petition is filed challenging the action of the respondents in trying to demarcate the petitioner’s land and insisting the petitioner to vacate from the land in an extent of Ac.2.00 Cents in Sy.No.309-4 which is bounded by East: Chejerla Venkataiah, S/o Ramanaiah Sy.No.309 (High tension Pole), West: Chejarla Ramanaiah, S/o Rosaiah, Sy.No.310, North:(Kunta), Nallipogu Rosaiah, S/o Seshaiah, Sy.No.308, South: Vaddipalli Pencalaiah, S/o Chinna 5 Penchalaiah Varapu Karraiah of Naginenigunta Revenue Village, Marripadu Mandal of S.P.S.R.
Respondent No.4 filed counter-affidavit and stated that the respondents are not trying to dispossess the petitioner and not insisting the petitioner to vacate from the land in an extent of Ac.2.00 cents in Sy.No.309-4 of Naginenigunta Village, Marripadu Mandal of S.P.S.R.
5. strict.
In view of the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.4, the present Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to follow due process of law, if at all they intend to conduct survey.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 25.02.2026 KBN 6 101 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.824 of 2023 Date: 25.02.2026 Date: 25.02.2026 KBN