Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

MEENAKSHI CONSTRUCTIONS vs THE STATE OF AP

Case NumberWP 3350/2023
Date of Filing9 Feb 2023
Case TypeWP
Last Hearing28 Mar 2023
State--
City--
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • MEENAKSHI CONSTRUCTIONS
Respondent
  • THE STATE OF AP
  • The Director of Municipal Administration
  • The District Collector
  • The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation
  • The Chief Planning Officer
  • The Superintendent Engineer
  • The Executive EngineerII
  • The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case Summary

MEENAKSHI CONSTRUCTIONS filed Case No. WP 3350/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 9 Feb 2023 against THE STATE OF AP and The Director of Municipal Administration. The case has had one hearing so far. The case is currently pending. 3 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (1)

  • 28MAR 2023
    Next Hearing

    Judge: N/A

Orders (3)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

APHC010067412023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 3350/2023 Between: 1.

MEENAKSHI CONSTRUCTIONS, REP.

BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER .B.

VEERA VENKATA RAMAKRISHNA, S/O.

ATCHUTA RAMAYYA, AGE 53 YEARS, R/O.50-121-57 FLAT NO.

101 ROYALE, BS LAYOUT, NEAR MORE SUPERMARKET, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH- 530013 ...PETITIONER AND 1.

THE STATE OF AP, REP.

BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2.

THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

3.

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM.

4.

THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP.

BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VISAKHAPATNAM.

5.

THE CHIEF PLANNING OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM.

6.

THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, GRATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM.

7.

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEERII, GRATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM.

2 8.

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.

BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLAT I T LING DEPARTMCNT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondents in withholding the undisputed bill amounts payable to the petitioner in respect of work i.e., Dismantling and Reconstruction of G plus 1 community hall i.e., R.T Club at Gollalapalem in Ward No.27 (SDFW DA) even after finalizing the bills as illegal arbitrary and contrary to the Principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to pay undisputed bill amount payable to the petitioner i.e.

Rs. r i.e.

Rs.7,32,553/- with respect to final bill forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to pay undisputed bill amounts i.e.

Rs.

Rs.7,32,553 /- with respect to work done i.e. "Dismantling and Reconstruction of G+1 community hall i.e., R.T Club at Gollalapalem in Ward No.27 (SDFW DA) ", pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.

C SUBODH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.

GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 2.

GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 3 The Court made the following Order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has completed the works entrusted by the 4th respondent-Corporation as per Agreement No.265/2018-2019/ S.E(W)/E.E-II/DB, dated 21.12.2018 and submitted final bills.

It is submitted that, in all, an amount of Rs.7,32,553/- is due payable to the petitioner.

However, amounts have not been paid.

Aggrieved by the same, the present Writ Petition is filed.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner; the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, for the respondents 1 and 2; the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance and Planning, for the respondents 3 and 8 and the learned Standing Counsel for respondents 4 to 7.

Considering the submissions, the 4th respondent is hereby directed to verify and release the payments due payable to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

No costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date : 23.07.2025 BMS