A YELAMANDA vs Y SRI LAKSHMI,I.A.S
Party Details
- A YELAMANDA
- Y SRI LAKSHMI I A S
- S S Rawat
- M Girija Shankar
- K Dinesh Kumar
- Y Koteswa Raoy
Case Summary
A YELAMANDA filed Case No. CC 1556/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 7 Mar 2023 against Y SRI LAKSHMI I A S and S S Rawat. The case has had one hearing so far. The case is currently pending. 3 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (1)
- 11APR 2023Next Hearing
Judge: N/A
Orders (3)
- 6MAR 2026judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 3
- 8JAN 2026orderView Order ↗
Order No: 2
- 14MAR 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: 1
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
APHC010116252023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1556/2023 Between: 1.
A YELAMANDA, S/O KOTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,CONTRACTOR, R/O 2-30,KAMBALAPADU, PODILI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1.
Y SRI LAKSHMI I A S, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATRAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR.
2.
S S RAWAT, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR.
3.
M GIRIJA SHANKAR, THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYATRAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, NAKKAL ROAD, SURYARAOPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4.
K DINESH KUMAR, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR (PANCHAYATRAJ WING), PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE.
5.
Y KOTESWA RAOY, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE (MGNREG) SCHEME, KANDUKUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may 2 be pleased to pleased to punish the Contemnors herein for willfully disobeying the orders of this Hon'ble High Court passed by His Lordship Sri Justice BATTU DEVANAND in W.P.No.
29286/2022, dt.
28.09.2022 and in such a way as this Hon'ble High Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to permit the petitioner to substitute the name of Gopala Krishna Dwivedi for the P* respondent in place of Y.Sri Lakshmi in CC.No.1556/2023 pending disposal of the above CC and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.
L J VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1.
RAMA RAO KOCHIRI 2.
KOCHIRI 2.
The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE No.1556 of 2023 ORDER: This contempt case is filed complaining the wilful disobedience of the order dated 28.09.2022 in W.P.No.29286 of 2022 passed by this Court.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, would submit that the order of the Court is complied with.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also endorsed the same, but would submit that the order of the Court is not complied with within the time stipulated by the Court and, as such, the compliance is not in the true letter and spirit.
On careful perusal of the record, it reveals that admittedly there is delay in implementing the order of the Court in its true letter and spirit within time stipulated by the Court.
In fact, this Court number of times advised the respondents to be more careful and conscious in implementing the orders of the Court within the time stipulated.
However, it appears that there is no change in the attitude of the officers.
In the present case also admittedly there is delay.
When this Court asked the respondents who are present before this 4 Court about the delay occurred in implementing the orders of the Court, they tendered their unconditional apology.
6.
Taking into consideration of the unconditional apology tendered by them as bonafide, this Court intends to take lenient view against them in this contempt case to meet the ends of justice.
7.
Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed.
8.
It is made it clear that the respondents shall be more careful and vigilant in implementing the orders of this Court in its true letter and spirit in future.
9.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Date: 06.03. te: 06.03.2026 JLV 5 200 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE No.1556 of 2023 Dt.06.03.2026 JLV