BAINBRIDGE NAVIGATION PTE.LTD vs BIGMANS METALS AND ALLOYS PVT.LTD
Party Details
- BAINBRIDGE NAVIGATION PTE LTD
- BIGMANS METALS AND ALLOYS PVT LTD
- The Port Officer
Case Summary
BAINBRIDGE NAVIGATION PTE LTD filed Case No. ICOMAOA 2/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 30 Jan 2023 against BIGMANS METALS AND ALLOYS PVT LTD and The Port Officer. The case has had one hearing so far. The case is currently pending. 6 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (1)
- 22FEB 2023Next Hearing
Judge: N/A
Orders (6)
- 8AUG 2024judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 7
- 18JUL 2024orderView Order ↗
Order No: 6
- 27JUN 2024orderView Order ↗
Order No: 5
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
1 BSB,J ICOMAOA No.2 of 2023 [ 3311 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI THURSDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO: 2 OF 2023 Between: 1.
BAINBRIDGE NAVIGATION PTE.LTD, 19-06, Tong Eng building, 101 Cecil Street, Singapore 069533, Represented by its authorized signatory Mr.
Madala Srinivas ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.
BIGMANS METALS AND ALLOYS PVT.LTD, No.
154/1 8th cross, 4th main road, Chamrajpet, Bengaluru - 560018, India.
2.
The Port Officer, Visakhapatnam Port and Harbour, Visakhapatnam. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI SAI SANJAY SURANENI Counsel for the Respondents: MURALI LINCOLN The Court made the following: ORDER: This International Commercial Arbitration Original Application is filed seeking the following reliefs: “…(a) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to pass an order directing the Respondents to furnish cash security for a sum of USD 99,200 + SGD 20,571 + simple interest @ 2% p.a. from the 2 BSB,J ICOMAOA No.2 of 2023 date of this petition till payment realization; (b) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to allow the Petitioner to sample and conduct survey and market valuation of the iron ore cargo of 3000 MTs of Iron Ore Fines currently lying at Visakhapatnam; (c) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to pass an order appointing a Receiver/Court Commissioner to take custody of the cargo of 3000 MTs of Iron Ore Fines currently lying at Visakhapatnam port; (d) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to pass an order directing the Respondent No.1 to bear all risk, costs, charges, expenses, levies of any kind whatsoever which may be incurred by the Petitioner in exercise of its lien over the cargo of 3000 MTs of iron ore fines, including storage and maintenance costs; (e) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to pass an order directing the Petitioner / Receiver to sell the attached cargo of 3000 MTs of Iron Ore Fines Ore Fines at Vishakapatnam port in the event of non-payment of sums to the Petitioner as set out in prayer clause (a) above; (f) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to auction sell the attached cargo of 3000 MTs of Iron Ore Fines at Vishakapatnam port in the event of non-payment of sums to the Petitioner as set out in prayer clause (a) above; (g) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to freeze the bank accounts held by Respondent No.1's, including but not limited to the bank account held with Standard Chartered Bank, 112 Vaishnavi Serenity, Koramangala Industrial Area, 5th block, Bangalore, Karnataka - 560095, till sale of the attached cargo of 3000 MTs of Iron Ore Fines at Vishakapatnam or till payment realization. (h) For ad interim reliefs in terms of prayer (a) to (g) above; (i) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to pass…” 2.
Sri D.Prudhviteja, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant submitted to close the present petition since it was filed 3 BSB,J ICOMAOA No.2 of 2023 before recognition of the award and later a separate execution petition in EXEP.No.1 of 2024 was filed for the execution of the award after its recognition and he sought liberty to proceed with the said execution petition.
3.
There is no representation for the respondent No.1.
4.
Ms.
Arshitha, learned counsel representing on behalf of respondent No.2 who is performing party is present.
5.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel representing the petitioner/applicant, the International Commercial Arbitration Original Application is closed giving liberty to the petitioner to proceed with the execution of the award in execution petition.
There shall be no order as to costs.
6.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed, and interlocutory orders, if any, pending shall stand vacated. ___________________ ___ JUSTICE B.S.
BHANUMATHI Date: 08.08.2024 DSV 4 BSB,J ICOMAOA No.
COMAOA No.2 of 2023 272 THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO: 2 OF 2023 Date: 08.08.2024 DSV 5 BSB,J ICOMAOA No.2 of 2023 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MAIN CASE NO : ICOMAOA.No.2 of 2023 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl.
No.
Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 08.08.2024 BSB, J International Commercial Arbitration Original Application is closed. (vide separate order) _________________ B.S.BHANUMATHI,J DSV 6 BSB,J ICOMAOA No.2 of 2023