T.MANIKYALA RAO vs TADI VENKATA UMA MAHESWARI RAO

APHC010166672023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 999/2023 Between: 1.

T.MANIKYALA RAO, (DIED) 2.

TADI MAHALAXMI,, W/O.

LATE MANIKYALA RAO, AGED 58 YEARS, R/O.

D.NO.36-46-86, KANCHARAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM.

3.

TADI SASHIKALA, , D/O.

LATE MANIKYALA RAO, AGED 36 YEARS, I.C.D.S., CHILD WELFARE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, NEAR MAGISTRATE COURT, PADERU.

4.

TADI SUDHAKAR,, S/O.

LATE MANIKYALA RAO, AGED 34 YEARS, R/O.

D.NO.36-46-86, KANCHARAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.

TADI VENKATA UMA MAHESWARI RAO, D/o.

Manikyaia Rao, Aged 44 years, R/o.

D.No.26-15-30, Kambala Tank, Rajahmundry at present Viskhapatnarn. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the 2 High Court may be pleased toThe above named petitioner begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition to this Honourable Court, against the Order dated 28.12.2022 in E.P.

No.28 cf 2017 in O.S.No.337 of 2003 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam, for the following among other grounds.

IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in EP No.28 of 2017 in OS No.337 of 2003 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the above CRP in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.

G RAMA GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent: 1.

V HEMANTH KUMAR 3 The Court made the following order: It is represented by the counsel for the petitioner that, the execution petition vide EP No. ide EP No.28 of 2017, on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam, was disposed of, in terms of compromise arrived between the parties, on 17.03.2025.

In view of the same, cause in the instant Civil Revision Petition does not survive.

2.

The said submission is placed on record.

In view of the same, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant revision and accordingly the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.

SEKHAR Dt.01.08.2025 DSB 4 204 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.

SEKHAR CRP No.999 of 2023 Date 01.08.2025 U DSB