MURUKUTI JAYAMMA vs GAYAM BRAHMAIAH

APHC010107062023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 717/2023 Between: 1.

MURUKUTI JAYAMMA, W/O KONDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O GARLADINNEPADU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, A.P 2.

CHINAMASU DHANALAXAMMA, , W/O PULLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O GARLADINNEPADU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, A.P ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.

GAYAM BRAHMAIAH, S/O RAMAIAH, R/O SC COLONY, ATMAKUR TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, A.P 2.

MAREMREDDY RAJA REDDY, S/O RAMANAIAH, R/O MUTHUKUR VILLAGE, ANANTHASAGARAMMANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, A.P 3.

CHENNUR NARESH, S/O ESWARAIAH, R/O MUTHUKUR VILLAGE, ANANTHASAGARAMMANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, A.P 4.

RAPURU HAZARATHAIAH, S/O SUBBA REDDY, R/O MUTHUKUR VILLAGE, ANANTHASAGARAMMANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, A.P 2 TCDS,J C.R.P.No.717 of 2023 5.

RAPURU KRISHNA REDDY, S/O SUBBA REDDY, R/O MUTHUKUR VILLAGE, ANANTHASAGARAMMANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, A.P 6.

KAKURU SREENIVASULU REDDY, R/O KAKURUVARIPALLE VILLAGE,ANANTHASAGARAMMANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, A.P ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to allow this CRP by setting aside the Order passed by the Learned III Additional District Judge, Nellore in I.A No.

442/2022 in O.S No 153 of 2012, dated 19-12-2022, consequently allow the I.A No.

442/2022 in O.S No 153 of 2012, dated 19-12-2022and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in 0.S No. in 0.S No.

153 of 2012 pending on the file of Learned III Additional District Judge, Nellore pending disposal of this case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.

V NITESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.

INAKOLLU VENKATESWARLU 3 TCDS,J C.R.P.No.717 of 2023 The Court made the following order: It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause in the revision petition does not survive.

2.

The said submission is placed on record.

3.

Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

There shall be no order as to costs.

4.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date: 30.06.2025 KGR