SANAGA SUBRAHMANYAM vs THE STATE OF AP
Party Details
- SANAGA SUBRAHMANYAM
- THE STATE OF AP
- The District Collector
- The Revenue Divisional Officer
- The Tahsildar
- K Suresh Kumar Reddy
- Vajrala Sivarami Reddy
Case Summary
SANAGA SUBRAHMANYAM filed Case No. WP 8597/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 4 Apr 2023 against THE STATE OF AP and The District Collector. The case has had one hearing so far. The case is currently pending. 6 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (1)
- 8MAY 2023Next Hearing
Judge: N/A
Orders (6)
- 31JAN 2026judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 6
- 27JAN 2026orderView Order ↗
Order No: 5
- 22DEC 2025orderView Order ↗
Order No: 4
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
APHC010166112023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] SATURDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 8592/2023 Between: 1.
SANAGA ESWARAIAH, S/O (LATE) RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC.
CULTIVATION, R/O.
NANCHARAMPET VILLAGE, MUTYALAPADU PANCHAYAT, CHILLAKURU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.
THE STATE OF AP, REP.
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P.
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP.
2.
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI, ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
3.
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUDURU DIVISION, GUDURU, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, 4.
THE TAHSILDAR, CHILLAKURU MANDAL, CHILLAKURU, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
5.
K SURESH KUMAR REDDY, S/O.
LATE RAMANA REDDY, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O.
D.NO.3-4-224, SANATHNAGAR, GUDURU, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.
6.
VAJRALA SIVARAMI REDDY, S/O.
KOTI REDDY, AGED 47 YEARS, R/O.
FLAT NO.104, RADHAKRISHNA RESIDENCY, NEAR GUDUR COURT, GUDURU, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.
RR 5 TO 6 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER COURTS ORDER DT.22.12.2025 IN I.A.NO.2 OF 2023 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in altered the revenue records such as Adangal / Pahani, 1-B record in respect of the land to an extent Ac.1- 20 cents in survey No.353/lA of Mutylapadu village, Chillakuru Mandal, Tirupati District, erstwhile SPSR Nellore District, by deleted the 2 petitioner's paternal grandmother name, without any notice, basis and without following the due process of law as contemplated under Sub.
Sec.
Sub.
Sec.(3) of Sec.5 of the A.P.
Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act 1971 and the Rules made there under is highly illegal, colourable exercise of power, violative of Principles of natural justice and violative of Art.19 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to restore the Petitioner's paternal grandmother name as owner in respect of the said land in Revenue Records, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents not to pay compensation to the 3rd parties of land acquire proceedings of widening Varagali Junction to Muthukuru road in respect of an extent of Ac.
1-20 cents in survey No.353/1A of Mutyalapadu Village, Chillakuru Mandal, Tirupati District, erstwhile SPSR Nellore District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to implead the Petitioners herein as Party Respondents No.5 and 6 in WP.No.8592/2023 and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant leave to the Respondent No.4 in Writ Petition No.8592 of 2023 to file the counter affidavit in the above writ petition and pass WRIT PETITION NO: 8597/2023 Between: 1.
SANAGA SUBRAHMANYAM, S/O (LATE) SOMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC.
CULTIVATION, NANCHARAMPET VILLAGE, MUTYALAPADU PANCHAYAT, R/O.
N CHILLAKURU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.
CT, AP.
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUDURU DIVISION, 3 GUDURU, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, 4.
FLAT NO.104, RADHAKRISHNA RESIDENCY, NEAR GUDUR COURT, GUDURU, TIRUPATI DISTRICT RR 5 TO 6 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER COURTS ORDER DT.22.12.2025 IN I.A.NO.2 OF 2023 ...RESPONDENT(S): WRIT PETITION NO: 8601/2023 Between: 1.
MANNE BALA RAMAIAH, S/O (LATE) MASTANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC.
RR 5 TO 6 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER COURTS ORDER DT.22.12.2025 IN I.A.NO.2 OF 2023 ...RESPONDENT(S): WRIT PETITION NO: 38870/2022 Between: 1.
MANNEM MASTNAMMA, W/O (LATE) MASTANAIAH, AGED 4 ABOUT 75 YEARS, OCC SENIOR CITIZEN, R/O.
NANCHARAMPET VILLAGE, MUTYALAPADU PANCHAYAT, CHILLAKURU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...
TRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.
THO.
THE TAHSILDAR, , CHILLAKURU MANDAL, CHILLAKURU, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 5.
K SURESH KUMAR REDDY, S/O LATE RAMANA REDDY, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3-4-224, SANATHNAGAR, GUDURU, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT.
VAJRALA SIVARAMI REDDY, S/O KOTI REDDY, AGED 47 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO.104, RADHAKRISHNA RESIDENCY, NEAR GUDUR COURT, GUDURU, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT.
RR 5 AND 6 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER DT.22.12.2025 IN I.A.NO.01 OF 2023. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.
HARISH KUMAR.T Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.
GP FOR REVENUE 2.
SODUM ANVESHA The Court made the following: 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.8592, 8597, 8601 of 2023 and 38870 of 2022 COMMON ORDER: Despite the writ petitions being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners.
Hence, it indicates that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petitions.
Therefore, the Writ Petitions are dismissed for non prosecution.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 31.01.2026 KBN/JAK 6 08 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.
8592, 8597, 8601 of 2023 and 38870 of 2022 Date: 31.01.2026 KBN