Meta Pixel
CNR: --
DISPOSED

MITTU RAJA PHAGUNU KHILLA vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

Case NumberCRLP 413/2023
Date of Filing20 Jan 2023
Case TypeCRLP
Last Hearing27 Mar 2023
State--
City--
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • MITTU AT RAJA AT PHAGUNU KHILLA
Respondent
  • THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

Case Summary

MITTU AT RAJA AT PHAGUNU KHILLA filed Case No. CRLP 413/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 20 Jan 2023 against THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. The case has had one hearing so far. The case was disposed of on 27 Mar 2023. 2 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (1)

  • 27MAR 2023
    Next Hearing

    Judge: N/A

Orders (2)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE B.S.BHANUMATHI Criminal Petition No.413 of 2023 ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by petitioner/A1 (Mittu @ Raja @ Phagunu Khilla) under Sections 437 and 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C’) seeking regular bail in Crime No.30 of 2022 of Munchingiput Police Station, Visakhapatnam District, registered on 20.06.2022 for the offence punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C) r/w 8(c), 25 of NDPS Act, 1985.

2.

Heard Sri.

J.

Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner/A1 and Sri.

P.M.

Mithileswara Redy, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondent/State.

3.

The case of the prosecution is that on 20.06.2022, A3 and A5 were nabbed carrying 560 kgs of ganja in Bolero Van and whereas, the present petitioner/A1 is stated to be the person who mediated A3 in securing ganja for transportation by establishing contact between A3 and a person by name Rajesh (A2).

The petitioner was taken into judicial custody in relation to 2 BSB, J Crl.P.No.413 of 2023 crime No.39 of 2022 for similar offence and has also been taken into judicial custody in the present crime i.e., crime No.30 of 2022 of Munchingiput Police Station on P.T.

Warrant.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that a false case was foisted against him and that except the alleged confession, there is no other evidence against the petitioner.

5.

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor opposed the petition since the petitioner is at the behest of all the transactions of the crime registered against him.

He submitted that the investigation is still pending.

He further stated that the petitioner hails from the State of Odisha.

6.

Perused the record.

7.

Since the contraband involved in this case is 560 kgs of ganja, bail to the accused cannot be granted by a Court unless it is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds that the petitioner is not guilty of commission of the offence. e offence.

In this matter, the statement of A3 discloses the telephone numbers as well, using of which, the transactions were managed.

3 BSB, J Crl.P.No.413 of 2023 8.

In view of the specific attributions made against the petitioner involving huge quantity of ganja, the petitioner cannot be granted bail at this juncture.

9.

In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.

No costs.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ B.S.BHANUMATHI, J Date:27-03-2023 GSP 4 BSB, J Crl.P.No.413 of 2023 22 THE HON’BLE Ms.

JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI CRL.

P.No.

413 of 2023 27.03.2023 GSP