VOOTLA RANGALAKSHMAMMA vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Party Details
- VOOTLA RANGALAKSHMAMMA
- THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
- The Commissioner
- The District Collector
- The District Medical and Health Officer
- The Medical Officer
- The Village Health and Sanitation Committee
- The Sarpanch
Case Summary
VOOTLA RANGALAKSHMAMMA filed Case No. WP 3017/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 7 Feb 2023 against THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH and The Commissioner. The case has had one hearing so far. The next hearing is scheduled for 1 Jan 5000. 7 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (1)
- 1JAN 5000Next Hearing
Judge: N/A
Orders (7)
- 22APR 2024judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 7
- 7MAR 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: 6
- 7MAR 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: 5
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
APHC010061772023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 3017/2023 Between: 1.
VOOTLA RANGALAKSHMAMMA, W/O RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC.
ASHA WORKER, R/O H.NO.2-2, PATHA MUDEVEMULA VILLAGE, TRIPURANTHAKAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY - FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2.
THE COMMISSIONER, FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, VIJAYAWADA.
3.
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
4.
THE DISTRICT MEDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICER, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
5.
THE MEDICAL OFFICER, I.P.H.C., TRIPURANTHAKAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
6.
THE VILLAGE HEALTH AND SANITATION COMMITTEE, REP.
BY MUDEVEMULA VILLAGE SARPANCH, MUDIVEMULA, TRIPURANTHAKAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
7.
THE SARPANCH, MUDIVEMULA GRAM PANCHAYAT, TRIPURANTHAKAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.
K ARUNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.
GP FOR SERVICES IV The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Smt.
K.
Aruna, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner submits that she has filed a Letter in the Registry dated 16.04.2024 along with the Letter written by her client (Writ Petitioner) dated 16.04.2024 seeking to withdraw the present Writ Petition.
Both the letters are taken on record.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
There shall be no Order as to costs.
Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this Order. ______________________________________ (GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J) Dt: 22.04.2024 JKS 55 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.