Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

M/s. Padmasri Borewells, vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case NumberWP 1639/2023
Date of Filing23 Jan 2023
Case TypeWP
Last Hearing11 Apr 2023
State--
City--
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • M/s Padmasri Borewells
Respondent
  • The State of Andhra Pradesh
  • The Andhra Pradesh Education and Welfare Infrastructure Development Corporation APEWIDC
  • The Executive Engineer

Case Summary

M/s Padmasri Borewells filed Case No. WP 1639/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 23 Jan 2023 against The State of Andhra Pradesh and The Andhra Pradesh Education and Welfare Infrastructure Development Corporation APEWIDC. The case has had one hearing so far. The case is currently pending. 5 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (1)

  • 11APR 2023
    Next Hearing

    Judge: N/A

Orders (5)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

APHC010031512023 IN TH MONDAY TWO THE HONOURA WR Between: 1.

M/S.

PADMASRI B REP.

BY ITS PR S/o.

J.

VENKATA S 1.

THE STATE OF A SECRETARY, F SECRETARIAT, VE 2.

THE ANDHRA INFRASTRUCTURE REP.

BY ITS MANA HEIGHTS, VADDES 3.

THE EXECUTIVE E AND WELFAR CORPORATION ( A Counsel for the Petition 1.Mr.K RATHANGA P Counsel for the Respon 1.GP FOR FINANCE 2.V.CH.NAIDU 1 E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Y,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYAS RIT PETITION No: 1639 of 2023 BOREWELLS, KURNOOL, KURNOO ROPRIETOR, J.

VENKATA SUB UBBAIAH.

AND ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.

BY ITS FINANCE & PLANNING D ELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

PRADESH EDUCATION & E DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AGING DIRECTOR, D.No.

7-96, SRI SWARARN, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR D ENGINEER, THE ANDHRA PRADESH RE INFRASTRUCTURE D APEWIDC), KURNOOL, KURNOOL D ...RES ner: PANI REDDY ndent(S): PLANNING DESH [3209] Y SURYA OL DISTRICT, BBA RAYUDU, ...PETITIONER S PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT, & WELFARE N (APEWIDC), SAI FORTUNE DISTRICT.

H EDUCATION EVELOPMENT DISTRICT.

SPONDENT(S): 2 The Court made the following Order: At the time of considering the matter, the learned counsel representing the respondent-Corporation states that the amount due to the petitioner has been released during the pendency of the writ petition.

The same is not disputed by the learned counsel representing the petitioner.

As the cause does not survive for adjudication in the writ petition, the same is closed.

No order as to costs.

Consequently, all pending applications shall stand closed. _____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J Date: 02.02.2026 BLV 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA W.P.No.1639 of 2023 Dt: 02.02.2026 BLV