K BHARATH REDDY vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Party Details
- K BHARATH REDDY
- THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
- The District Collector
- The Revenue Divisional Officer
- The Tahsildar
Case Summary
K BHARATH REDDY filed Case No. WP 4049/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 16 Feb 2023 against THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH and The District Collector. The case has had one hearing so far. The case was disposed of on 20 Feb 2023. 1 order has been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (1)
- 20FEB 2023Next Hearing
Judge: N/A
Orders (1)
- 20FEB 2023judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 1
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION No.4049 of 2023 Sri K.
Bharath Reddy, S/o.
Kalavagunta Mahadeva Reddy, aged about 35 years, Occ: Reporter, R/o.
Gottipudi Village and Post, Thottambedu Mandal, Chittoor District (presently Tirupati District). ….
Petitioner Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.
By Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District and 3 others. ….Respondents ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents.
2.
The grievance of the writ petitioner is that, the 3rd respondent is trying to dispossess the petitioner from the Plot No.1 in an extent of Acres 0.02 cents in Survey No.39-5 situated at Eedulagunta Village, Thottambedu Mandal, Srikalahasti, Tirupati District.
3.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the certificate issued by the 4th respondent dated 18.01.2020 2 discloses that the petitioner is in possession and enjoyment of the Plot No.1 in an extent of Acres 0.02 cents in Survey No.39-5 situated at Eedulagunta Village, Thottambedu Mandal, Srikalahasti, Tirupati District.
While so, the 4th respondent is trying to dispossess the petitioner now on the ground that it requires for some other purpose.
4.
On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents upon instructions submits that the 4th respondent is not interfering with the petitioner’s subject property in an extent of Acres 0.02 cents in Survey No.39-5 situated at Eedulagunta Village, Thottambedu Mandal, Srikalahasti, Tirupati District.
5.
In view of the above said statement made by the 4th respondent by way of written instructions, no orders are necessary in this writ petition.
6.
Accordingly, the writ petition is closed.
No costs.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. nd closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 20.02.2023 PGT