SMT.MADDELA FLORENCE ANGEL VIJAYA RANI vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Party Details
- SMT MADDELA FLORENCE ANGEL VIJAYA RANI
- THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
- District Collector
- Superintendent of Police
- Station House Officer
- Sri M Sairam
- Sri S Brahmam
- The Rt Rev E Pushpa Lalitha
- Sri K D J R Kennedy
- Smt P Mary Krupavathi
Case Summary
SMT MADDELA FLORENCE ANGEL VIJAYA RANI filed Case No. WP 8540/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 4 Apr 2023 against THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH and District Collector. The case has had one hearing so far. The case is currently pending. 3 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (1)
- 17APR 2023Next Hearing
Judge: N/A
Orders (3)
- 29APR 2025judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 3
- 25APR 2025orderView Order ↗
Order No: 2
- 10APR 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: 1
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
APHC010166892023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8540/2023 Between: Smt.Maddela Florence Angel Vijaya Rani ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.
N VIJAYA BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.
GP FOR HOME 2.
GP FOR REVENUE 3.
Y JAYA RAJU 4.
L V S NAGARAJU The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ... to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly a Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the respondents in filing Charge Sheet in Crime Number 374 of 2021 U/s.188, 341, 355 r/w.34 IPC on the file of III Town PS Nandyal, Nandyal District as illegal, arbitrary, biased, unconstitutional against the principles of natural justice.” 2.
When the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and that the relief sought for has become infructuous.
3.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance.
2 4.
In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
No order as to costs.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR.
JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No.
8540 of 2023 29.04.2025 Mjl /*