Dr MADASU PRAVEENA vs THE STATE OF AP
Party Details
- Dr MADASU PRAVEENA
- THE STATE OF AP
- The Commissioner of Andhra Pradesh Vaidya Vidhana
- The Director
- The District CoOrdinator of Andhra Pradesh Vaidya Vidhana
- The Assistant Director Administration
- The Superintendent
Case Summary
Dr MADASU PRAVEENA filed Case No. WP 209/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 3 Jan 2023 against THE STATE OF AP and The Commissioner of Andhra Pradesh Vaidya Vidhana. The case is currently pending. 2 orders have been issued in this matter.
Orders (2)
- 20JUN 2024judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 2
- 3JAN 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: 1
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
APHC010004072023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 209/2023 Between: 1.
DR MADASU PRAVEENA, D/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC.
PRACTICING DOCTOR, R/0 4-1-218, RAJAPANAGAL ROAD, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE, ANDHRA PRADESH- 523001 ...PETITIONER AND 1.
THE STATE OF AP, REP.
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MEDICAL AND FAMILY WELFARE, A.P.
SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2.
THE COMMISSIONER OF ANDHRA PRADESH VAIDYA VIDHANA, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
3.
THE DIRECTOR, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH.
4.
THE DISTRICT COORDINATOR OF ANDHRA PRADESH VAIDYA VIDHANA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE, ANDHRA PRADESH.
5.
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR ADMINISTRATION, ANDHRA PRADESH VAIDYA VIDHANA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE, ANDHRA PRADESH.
6.
THE SUPERINTENDENT, AREA HOSPITAL, CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.
JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.
GP FOR SERVICES IV The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Ms.
Kota Krishna Deepthi, Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of SriJ.
Sravan Kumar, Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner submits that the grievance of the Writ Petitioner is redressed during the pendency of the present Writ Petition and therefore, no further consideration is necessary.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of.
No order as to costs.
Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 20.06.2024 DSV 61 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD W.P.No.209 of 2023 Date:20.06.2024 DSV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No.W.P.No.
No.W.P.No.209 of 2023 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl.
No.
DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 03.
20.06.2024 GRKP,J This Writ Petition is disposed of. (Vide Separate Order) _________ GRKP,J DSV