Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

PEKETI ABHILASH REDDY vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case NumberWP 8950/2023
Date of Filing11 Apr 2023
Case TypeWP
Last Hearing19 Apr 2023
State--
City--
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • PEKETI ABHILASH REDDY
Respondent
  • The State of Andhra Pradesh
  • The District Collector
  • The Tahsildar
  • The Mandal Surveyor

Case Summary

PEKETI ABHILASH REDDY filed Case No. WP 8950/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 11 Apr 2023 against The State of Andhra Pradesh and The District Collector. The case has had one hearing so far. The case is currently pending. 4 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (1)

  • 19APR 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: The Honourable Sri Justice NYAPATHY VIJAY

Orders (4)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION No.8905 of 2023 ORDER: 1.

The present petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondent in not releasing the refund of Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) and withheld amounts totalling to Rs.73,33,624/- for the work executed.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has entered into various agreements with the respondents for the works in Nandyal District and he completed the work as per the agreements.

Execution of work was entered into measurement book prepared by the respondent authorities without noticing any defects.

The amount for execution of work was paid to the petitioner, but the earnest money deposit and withheld amount was not released even after completion of defect liability period.

The petitioner has approached the respondents several times for reimbursement of the earnest money deposit and withheld amount.

As the respondents have failed to release the earnest money deposit and withheld amount, the petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondent authorities for release of earnest money deposit and withheld amount.

3.

Learned Government Pleader submitted that the respondents are ready to pay the amounts due to the petitioner.

2 4.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

5.

Keeping in view facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by both learned counsel and on perusing the material placed on record, as there is no justification in withholding the earnest money deposit and withheld amount, even after completion of defect liability period and completion of the work allotted by the respondents, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to release the earnest money deposit and withheld amount due to the petitioner for the last several months.

6. months.

6.

In the result, this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to release the Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) and withheld amounts totalling to Rs.73,33,624/- to the petitioner within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

There shall be no order as to costs.

7.

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _______________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 06.12.2023 DNV 3 146 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION No.8905 of 2023 06.12.2023 DNV