OMMI ARUNA vs THE STATE OF AP
Party Details
- OMMI ARUNA
- Bora Suribabu
- Dammu Lakshmi
- Muddada Sanyasi Rao
- THE STATE OF AP
- The Commissioner of Police
- The Stattion House officer
- G Rama Chandra Rao
Case Summary
OMMI ARUNA and Bora Suribabu filed Case No. WP 20724/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 9 Aug 2023 against THE STATE OF AP and The Commissioner of Police. The case has had one hearing so far. The case is currently pending. 5 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (1)
- 14AUG 2023Next Hearing
Judge: N/A
Orders (5)
- 8DEC 2025judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 6
- 5DEC 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: 5
- 28AUG 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: 4
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
APHC010399752023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20724/2023 Between: 1.
OMMI ARUNA, W/O BARINIKANI VENKATA RAO AGED 31 YRS, D.NO.3-58, VELLANKI , NEAR BANGARAMMATALLI TEMPLE,ANANDAPURAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
2.
BORA SURIBABU, S/O LATE RAMULU AGED 51 YRS, D.NO.1-103 PARADESIPALEM VILLAGE VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL , VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
3.
DAMMU LAKSHMI, W/O(LATE) ESWARA RAO AGED 36 YRS, D.NO.1-1,AARIGIPALEM VILLAGE VEPADAMANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT PRESENTLY AT VISAKHAPATNAM.
4.
MUDDADA SANYASI RAO, S/O MUDDADA SURAPPADU AGED 36 YRS , D.NO.2-23 LODAGALAVANIPALEM VILLAGE ANANDAPURAM MANDALAM VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.
THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME) SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI , AMARAVATHI.
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY.
THE STATTION HOUSE OFFICER, ANANDAPURAM POLICE STATION , ANANDAPURAM , VISAKHAPTNAM .
G RAMA CHANDRA RAO, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED 55 YRS , OCC CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANANDRAPURAM POLICE STATION , VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to pass an Order to Issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the actoin of the respondents Police particularly the 3rd and 4th Respondents trying to Interfere into the Petitioners Possessoin and Enjoymnet of the Property in an extent of 0-57 cents situated at Survey No.293/19 of Anandapuram Revenue Village , Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhpatnam District by Utilisng their Own Police Power, Influence even without have any right nor Jurisdiction there by exceeding ther powers , limits on that Calling the Petitioners continuously tinuously to the Police Station unlawfully, illegally without have any case nor issuance of summons by violation of Article 14,19,21, 300-A-of the Consitutoin of India , violation of police standing orders Consequetnly to direct the respondents 3 AND 4 not to interfere into the Civil Disputes i.e., petitoiner property in an extent of 0-57 cents situated at Survey No.293/19 of Anandapuram Revenue Village , Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhpatnam District nor question the rights of the property nor possessoin by any means or what so ever and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to pass an to direct the respondents 3 & 4 not to Callfor the petitioners to the police station nor interfere into the Civil Disputes i.e., petitoiner property in an extent of 0-57 cents situated at Survey No.293/19 of Anandapuram Revenue Village , Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhpatnam District including threats to settle the civil disputes pending disposal of the main writ petition in the interest of the justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.
R SIVA SAI SWARUP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.
GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20724 OF 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to to Issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the actoin of the respondents Police particularly the 3rd and 4th Respondents trying to Interfere into the Petitioners Possessoin and Enjoymnet of the Property in an extent of 0-57 cents situated at Survey No.293/19 of Anandapuram Revenue Village , Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhpatnam District by Utilisng their Own Police Power, Influence even without have any right nor Jurisdiction there by exceeding ther powers , limits , limits on that Calling the Petitioners continuously to the Police Station unlawfully, illegally without have any case nor issuance of summons by violation of Article 14,19,21, 300-A-of the Consitutoin of India , violation of police standing orders Consequetnly to direct the respondents 3 AND 4 not to interfere into the Civil Disputes i.e., petitoiner property in an extent of 0-57 cents situated at Survey No.293/19 of Anandapuram Revenue Village , Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhpatnam District nor question the rights of the property nor possessoin by any means or what so ever and to pass…” 2.
Heard Sri R.Siva Sai Swarup, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that, the police never interfered into the petitioners possession and enjoyment of the property and never threatened the petitioner to settle the civil disputes between the petitioner and unofficial respondent.
The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
5.
Considering the submissions made, the writ petition is disposed of.
However, respondent-police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ Dr.
JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.12.2025 KKV HON’BLE DR.
JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.20724 of 2023 Dated.08.12.2025 KKV 89 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: W.P.No.20724 of 2023 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl.
No.
Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 08.12.2025 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP,J KKV