TAMMINANA VANAJAXI vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Party Details
- TAMMINANA VANAJAXI
- THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
- District Level Development Officer
- Mandal Parishad Development Officer
- The Maripadu C Grama panchayat
- Hanumathu Sambayya
Case Summary
TAMMINANA VANAJAXI filed Case No. WP 20168/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 5 Aug 2023 against THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH and District Level Development Officer. The case has had one hearing so far. The case is currently pending. 2 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (1)
- 9AUG 2023Hearing
Judge: N/A
Orders (2)
- 18AUG 2023judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 4
- 9AUG 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: 1
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO.20168 OF 2023 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief: “..declaring the action of the respondents particularly 3rd respondent herein not to take dispossession of my scheduled property of my residential house and open land assessment no.335 in Sy.no.290 to an extent of 66.67 sq feet and open land 18 Cents Slab house with vacant land Door no.3-2 Madura Bangeeru Village, Jalakalingapuram Village, Marripadu Mandal revenue, Srikakulam District And consequently direct the respondent herein not to interfere my peaceful possession and for other reliefs and pass..” 2.
Heard Sri Vinodin Ruth, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Sri N.Sri Hari, learned Standing Counsel.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the respondent authorities are trying to interfere and dispossess the petitioner from the subject property to an extent of 66-67 sq.ft in Sy.No.290 and open land of 18 cents slab house with vacant land in Door No.3-2 at Madura Bangeeru village, Jalakalingapuram village, Marripadu Mandal revenue, Srikakulam District.
As such prayed to pass appropriate orders in that regard.
4.
Sri N.Srihari, learned Standing Counsel on written instructions dated 18.08.2023 submitted that, the authorities are not interfering and trying to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property and 2 in the event if they want to interfere, they would definitely follow the due process.
As such, prayed to pass appropriate orders in that regard.
5.
To the said submission, learned counsel for the petitioner requested to record the contentions and prayed to dispose of the writ petition.
6.
Taking into consideration the submissions of both the learned counsel, as the authorities are not interfering and trying to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property, instead of keeping this writ petition pending, this court is inclined to dispo d to dispose of this writ petition with the following direction: The respondent authorities are directed not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property except under due process of law.
No orders as to costs.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
No costs.
Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 18.08.2023, BRS