AYODHYA BALAKRISHNA vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

APHC010385632023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19931 OF 2023 Between: 1.

AYODHYA BALAKRISHNA, S/o.

Surya Narayana Aged above 65 years, R/o.

Door No.

48-4-4A, Ashok gardens, Gunadala, Vijayawada, NTR District. ...Petitioner AND 1.

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.

2.

The Commissioner of Police, NTR District at Vijayawada.

3.

The Station House officer, Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada, NTR District.

4.

Elaprolu Nalini Kanth, S/o.

Radha Krishna @ Radha Krishna Murhly, D.No.48-1-3/1, Gunadala, Vijayawada.

NTR District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue writ or direction particularly in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, A).To declare the inaction of the respondents No.

1 to 3 in initiating appropriate action against respondent No.4 and his men pursuant to the complaint given to the 2nd respondent through Spandana vide Receipt No.2059-2023/ Spandana/ Vijayawada/2023, dated.

24-07-2023, as illegal, void, arbitrary and violating the fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and also my right over the subject property under Article 300-A of the constitution of India apart from violating the directions of this Hon'ble court.

B).Consequently, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to initiate action pursuant to the complaint given to the 2nd respondent through Spandana vide Receipt No.

2059-2023/ Spandana/ Vijayawada/2023, dated.

23, dated.

24-07-2023, and direct to provide protection to the petitioner and his family members from the 4th respondent and his men forthwithand pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to initiate action pursuant to the complaint given to the 2nd respondent through Spandana vide Receipt No.

24-07-2023 and to direct to provide protection to the petitioner and his family members from the 4th respondent and his men forthwith pending disposal of the writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: RAMA RAO KOCHIRI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19931 OF 2023 The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue writ or direction particularly in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, A).To declare the inaction of the respondents No.

1 to 3 in initiating appropriate action against respondent No.4 and his men pursuant to the complaint given to the 2nd respondent through Spandana vide Receipt No.2059-2023/ Spandana/Vijayawada/2023, dated.

2059- 2023/Spandana/Vijayawada/2023, dated.

24-07-2023, and direct to provide protection to the petitioner and his family members from the 4th respondent and his men forthwith and pass such other order or orders…” 2.

It is noted that the learned counsel for the petitioner has become Government Pleader.

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents, on written instructions, brought to the notice of this Court that based on the contents in the Spandana complaint dated 24.07.2023 made by the petitioner, it is found that the matter is civil in nature.

He further submits that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties.

Recording the above submissions, the writ petition is disposed of.

The petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ Dr.

JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 04.12.2025 Ksj