Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

KANAKATA RAMBABU vs THE STATE OF AP

Case NumberWP 19740/2023
Date of Filing27 Jul 2023
Case Type-
Last Hearing--
State--
City--
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • KANAKATA RAMBABU
Respondent
  • Government Of Andhra Pradesh
  • The Director General Of Police
  • The Superintendent of Police
  • The Station House Officer
  • Kankata Brahmam
  • Gummadi Srinivas
  • Kankata Rambau

Case Summary

KANAKATA RAMBABU filed Case No. WP 19740/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 27 Jul 2023 against Government Of Andhra Pradesh and The Director General Of Police. The case is currently pending. 5 orders have been issued in this matter.

Orders (5)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

APHC010371792023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19740/2023 Between: 1.

KANAKATA RAMBABU, S/O.VENKATESWARLLU, AGED BOUT 53 YRS, R/O.PUSAPADU VILLAGE, INKOLLU MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT,AP ...PETITIONER AND 1.

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY HOM DET.

SECRETARIATEBUILDINGS,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI,GUNTUR DIST.

2.

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI,KOLAN UKONDA.

3.

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAPATLA, DISTRICT, BAPATLA.

4.

THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , PS INKOLLU MANDAL, BAPATLA,AP.

5.

KANKATA BRAHMAM, S/O.CHINNABBAI,AGED ABOUT.

R/O.PUSAPADU VILLAGE,NEAR POLERAMMA TEMPLE, INKOLLU MANDAL,BAPATLA DISTRICT, AP.PIN.523190.

6.

GUMMADI SRINIVAS, S/O.VEERAIAH,AGED ABOUT.

7.

KANKATA RAMBAU, S/O.SUBBA RAMAIAH,AGED ABOUT.

Page 2 of 5 R/O.PUSAPADU VILLAGE,NEAR POLERAMMA TEMPLE, INKOLLU MANDAL,BAPATLA DISTRICT, AP.PIN.523190. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order Or proceeding, Writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action in the 4th Respondent in interfering with the petitioner's life and personal liberty, inflicting threats to ruin petitioner's life by calling him to the police station, preassurising the petitioner to settel with the respondents 5 to 7 herein as as illegal, arbitrary, Violative of Art.

14 and Art.

21 of the Constitution of India and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased plea eased pleased It is also just and necessary to direct the Respondent No.4 not to take coercive steps against the petitioner unless he is required in any crime pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.

P V A PADMANABHAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.

GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: Page 3 of 5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19740 of 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an order Or proceeding, Writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action in the 4th Respondent in interfering with the petitioner's life and personal liberty, inflicting threats to ruin petitioner's life by calling him to the police station, preassurising the petitioner to settel with the respondents 5 to 7 herein as as illegal, arbitrary, Violative of Art.

21 of the Constitution of India and to pass.…” 2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.

Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are calling the petitioner to the police station, in the absence of any crime registered and pressurizing the petitioner to settle the civil disputes in between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents.

Learned counsel would further submit that a direction may be given to the police.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between petitioner and the unofficial respondents.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of.

Page 4 of 5 6.

Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. sposed of.

However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent, except under due procedure of law.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ Dr.

JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.12.2025.

TVN Page 5 of 5 HON’BLE DR.

JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.19740 of 2023 Dated.09.12.2025 TVN 291