Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

G S SUCHITH vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

Case NumberWP 19567/2023
Date of Filing31 Jul 2023
Case Type-
Last Hearing--
State--
City--
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • G S SUCHITH
Respondent
  • THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
  • The State of Andhra Pradesh
  • The Commissioner and Inspector General of Registration and Stamps
  • The District Collector
  • The Tahsildar
  • The SubRegistrar

Case Summary

G S SUCHITH filed Case No. WP 19567/2023 in the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh on 31 Jul 2023 against THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH and The State of Andhra Pradesh. The case is currently pending. 1 order has been issued in this matter.

Orders (1)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No.19567 of 2023 Between:- G.S.Suchith … Petitioner And The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District & 5 others. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.Marri Venkata Ramana Counsel for the Respondents : Government Pleader for Revenue ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Also heard learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.

2.

The present writ petition is filed aggrieved by the inaction of the revenue authorities/respondents 1,4 & 5 on the petitioner’s representation dated 28.04.2023 submitted for deleting the lands admeasuring Ac.1.07 cents in Survey No.221/1A/4B, Ac.0.64 cents in Survey No.221/1A/1B and Ac.0.53 cents in Survey No.221/1A/4A of Adinepalli Village, Pakala Mandal from the list of prohibited properties under Section 22-A(1)(a) of Registration Act, 1908.

2 3.

Though the learned counsel for the petitioner sought to advance arguments with reference to the averments made in the Writ Affidavit, in view of the submission made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue that the petitioner has to make an application seeking deletion of the subject matter property from the Prohibited Category List and if he makes any such application, necessary action would be taken by the 4th respondent, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would make online application seeking deletion of the subject matter property from the Prohibited Category List.

4.

Therefore, the Writ Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to make appropriate online application, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. his order.

The 4th respondent in turn shall pass appropriate orders, in accordance with Law after giving opportunity to the petitioner, within a period of four (4) months from the date of receipt of the application, if any, made by the petitioner.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA BLV Date: 04.08.2023 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION No.19567 of 2023 Date: 04.08.2023 BLV