V MEENAKSHI vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

APHC010371632023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 19164/2023 Between: 1.

V MEENAKSHI, W/O LATE V LAKSHMI NARAYANA, AGED 54 YEARS, OCC.

HOME MAKER, 2.

V.YUGANDER NAIDU,, S/O LATE LAKSHMI NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, UNEMPLOYEE, BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF 2/8, RAMALAYAM, K SUGUMANCHUPALLI, RS KONDAPURAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2.

THE APSRTC ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REP.

BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, RTC HOUSE, 3RD FLOOR, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH, 520013.

3.

THE REGIONAL MANAGER, APSRTC, ANANTHAPURAM.

4.

THE DEPOT MANAGER, APSRTC, TADIPATRI, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in 2 CGR, J.

W.P.No.19164 of 2023 the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the case of the 2nd Petitioner for appointment to a suitable post on compassionate grounds, arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and to issue a consequential direction to the Respondents 2 to 4 to provide appointment to the 2nd Petitioner on compassionate grounds forthwith and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.

A RAJENDRA BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.

GP FOR SERVICES II 2.

K VISWANATHAM (SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following: 3 CGR, J.

W.P.No.19164 of 2023 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Writ Petition No.19164 of 2023 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.

2. tition.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Date:07.07.2025. cs