SRI ANDHRA RASTRIYA AADHISAIVA ARCHAKA SOCIETY vs THE STATE OF AP

APHC010377232023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 19174/2023 Between: Sri Andhra Rastriya Aadhisaiva (archaka) Society, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.

D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.

GP FOR ENDOWMENTS 2.

PADMAVATHI PADNAVIS The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments for the respondent Nos.

1 and 2.

Inspite of service of notice to the 3rd respondent, none appears.

2 2.

The grievance of the writ petitioners is that their representation dated 20.06.2023 has not been considered so far by the 2nd respondent.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners’ association is a very old association knowing the problems of Archakas and the suggestions can be given by the petitioners’ Association for their improvement and wellbeing if the 2nd respondent invites the petitioners also for any such discussions to consider the demands and needs of the Archakas.

It would be proper and necessary to consider the suggestions of the petitioners also and it would be appropriate also.

But so far no decision is taken on the above said representation of the petitioners.

4.

Inspite of giving number of adjournments no counter is filed by the respondent Nos.

5.

In view of the above said facts and circumstances, this court directs the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioners dated 20.06.2023 if not already disposed off as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this order by giving due opportunity to all the parties concerned including the petitioners and the 3rd respondent. espondent.

Appropriate decision shall be taken by the 2nd respondent on it’s own merits strictly in accordance with law.

3 6.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 12.03.2024.

UPS