MR MOKSSH SHARRMA vs BPTP LTD

It is submitted by learned counsels, that parties have reached a settlement. As per learned counsel for DH, her client wants to withdraw the execution petition. Statement of learned counsel is recorded separately.                           Considering the fact that matter has already been settled, no need to recover any amount from JD. As recovery certificate has already been issued, let intimation in this regard be given to the Collector, Gurugram by sending a copy of this order, Other copy be given to the JD, to be served upon Collector, Gurugram,                          File be consigned to the Records.

Proxy counsel for applicant/JD requests for adjournment stating that main counsel could not come today. Allowed.                           To come on 13.07.2023 for further proceedings.

Certain objections are filed on behalf of JD. Copy Given.                        Apart from same, an application is also filed. It is stated that JD is paying a sum of Rs. 6,28,649/- (claimed to be entire decretal amount) through a cheque, which is handed over to learned counsel for DH, today in court. Counsel for DH accepts the same as part payment. According to her, some more amount remains due against JD.                            This is a petition seeking execution of order passed by the Authority, in favour of DH/complainant. The authority through an order/resolution dated on 16.03.2022 delegated its powers to this forum to execute its orders. As per judgment of Hon’ble High Court of Punjab & Haryana, Chandigarh, in case tilted as M/s International Land Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Aditi Chauhan and others CWP No. 7738 of 2022, and M/s International Land Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Nitin Mathur and others CWP 7750 of 2022 for recovery of amount, recovery certificate is required to be issued to the collector concerned. Let file be sent back to the authority with a request to issue  recovery certificate/further orders.                         Be put up before the Authority on 11.01.2023.