Meta Pixel
CNR: --
DISPOSED

ASHISH SHARMA vs VATIKA LTD

Case NumberRERA-GRG-3792-2019
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing14 Mar 2023
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2019

Party Details

Petitioner
  • ASHISH SHARMA
Respondent
  • VATIKA LTD

Case Summary

ASHISH SHARMA filed Case No. RERA-GRG-3792-2019 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against VATIKA LTD. The case has undergone 5 hearings over 3 years and 4 months. The case was disposed of on 14 Mar 2023. 6 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (5)

  • 14MAR 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    On the last date of hearing Shri Anurag Advocate, appeared on behalf of the respondent and sought short adjournment for filing of reply. The said request was allowed and the respondent was directed to file the reply within two weeks in the registry along with a cost of Rs. 10,000/- to be paid to the complainant.  However till date neither the reply has been filed nor the cost imposed during the last proceedings has been paid to the complainant.  Further, both the counsels state that the matter could not be amicably settled and hence the counsel for the complainant requests for hearing on merits. The counsel for the complainant further states that the unit was booked on 01.10.2012  and as per SOA at Annexure C4, the complainant allottee has made a payment of Rs.16,45,068/- till date and this payment as per SOA  is against a specific unit measuring 1610 sq. feet to be situated in the Seven Element (at page 33).  However,  no BBA was issued as there were discussion of change of the unit by the respondent but till date neither any alternative unit has been offered or BBA  has been executed and the allottee does not wish to continue  in the project and requests for refund of the amount deposited alongwith interest. The counsel for the respondent states that  he is filing the reply today and cost of Rs.10,000/- in cash has been paid to the counsel of the complainant during proceedings. But it is a matter of great regret that neither the counsel nor three number of representatives  present in person is clear as to on what basis cancellation has been made and also not clear why the deductions have been made when no BBA has been issued and allottee has been requesting for the same  since 2015.  No reply has been filed till date despite multiple opportunities and hence, right to file the reply is struck off. Both the counsels may submit written submissions within 10 days after supplying a copy to each other. Arguments heard. Order reserved. Detailed order will follow. Matter stands disposed off.  File be consigned to the registry.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 7FEB 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The counsel for the complainant states that no settlement has been arrived at between the parties.  The matter may be decided on merits.              No reply has been filed by the respondent till date. The counsel for the respondent is directed to file reply within next 2 weeks with a cost of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to the complainant failing which the reply would be submitted with a cost of Rs.10,000/-.              Matter to come up on 14.03.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 8DEC 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Both the counsels for the parties have stated at bar that the settlement talks are in progress between the parties and seek a short adjournment. Heard. Request is allowed. Matter to come  up on  07.02.2023   for filing settlement deed if matter is amicably settled failing which the matter shall be heard on merits.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 10NOV 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The complainant filed the present complaint on 20.09.2019. The aforesaid complaint was disposed of vide order dated 13.11.2019 of authority on account of pendency of judgement with regards to jurisdiction of authority for dealing matters of refund. In view of judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court M/s Newtech Promoters & Developers Private Limited Vs State of U.P. & Ors, 2021-2022(1)RCR (C)357, it was upheld that the matters regarding refund and interest under section 18(1) of Act of 2016 are to be decided by the Authority. No reply has been filed by the respondent till date.  Counsel of the respondent  has appeared on behalf of the respondent and requests for a short adjournment for filing of reply a copy of which is being supplied to the counsel of complainant during proceedings and shall be filed in the registry of the authority within 3 days.  The counsel for the  respondent  states that delay in filing reply was not intentional as  online  status of the case on the website of the authority was being shown as disposed off which be corrected by the registry of the Authority.  The counsel for the respondent is directed to supply reply to the complainant with a cost of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to the complainant and the same be filed with the registry within a week.  Matter to come up on 08.12.2022 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 13NOV 2019
    Hearing

    Judge: SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL

    RE-OPENED

    Stage: RE-OPEN/PENDING

Orders (6)